Find Least Value of \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right|, |z| ≥ 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarshakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
AI Thread Summary
The least value of |z + 1/z| for |z| ≥ 3 is determined to be 8/3, contrary to the incorrect assertion of 10/3. The reasoning involves recognizing that the inequality |z - (-1/z)| ≥ |z| - |-1/z| does not guarantee that minimizing the right side will yield the minimum for the left side. A specific example using z = iy along the imaginary axis shows that |z + 1/z| can indeed reach 8/3. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the method of minimization is applicable to the specific problem at hand.
utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Least value of \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right| if |z|\geq3 is


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|

So the minimum value will be

|z|- \frac{1}{|z|}

Now for minimum value
|z| = 3 as it is the minimum value of |z|

Substituting the value of |z| I get
3- \frac{1}{3}
=\frac{8}{3}

But the correct answer is \frac{10}{3}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
utkarshakash said:

Homework Statement


Least value of \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right| if |z|\geq3 is


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|

So the minimum value will be

|z|- \frac{1}{|z|}

Now for minimum value
|z| = 3 as it is the minimum value of |z|

Substituting the value of |z| I get
3- \frac{1}{3}
=\frac{8}{3}

But the correct answer is \frac{10}{3}

Your reasoning is wrong (or at least, incomplete---see below), but you have arrived at the correct answer. The minimum value is, indeed, 8/3, and the posted answer of 10/3 is incorrect. Hint: to show that 10/3 is incorrect, look for a value z = iy along the imaginary axis that gives z + 1/z = (8/3)i, so for that z we have |z + 1/z| = 8/3, which is less that the alleged minimum of 10/3.

So, what did you do wrong? Well, your inequality
\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|
is, indeed, true, but for some z it might be a strict inequality, so there is no guarantee that minimizing the right-hand-side will give an achievable minimum to the left-hand-side. I'll leave it up to you to see what else needs to be done to fix the argument.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
Your reasoning is wrong (or at least, incomplete---see below), but you have arrived at the correct answer. The minimum value is, indeed, 8/3, and the posted answer of 10/3 is incorrect. Hint: to show that 10/3 is incorrect, look for a value z = iy along the imaginary axis that gives z + 1/z = (8/3)i, so for that z we have |z + 1/z| = 8/3, which is less that the alleged minimum of 10/3.

So, what did you do wrong? Well, your inequality
\left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right|
is, indeed, true, but for some z it might be a strict inequality, so there is no guarantee that minimizing the right-hand-side will give an achievable minimum to the left-hand-side. I'll leave it up to you to see what else needs to be done to fix the argument.

RGV

I can't make out any fault in my reasoning. Can you please bring it out?
 
utkarshakash said:
I can't make out any fault in my reasoning. Can you please bring it out?

I have already explained why your reasoning is incomplete: you have some expression A that you want to minimize, and you know that A ≥ B for some other expression B. Minimizing B does not necessarily minimize A.

For example, if f(x) = (x-1)2+ x4 and g(x) = (x-1)2, we certainly have f(x) ≥ g(x) for all x (and f = g for some x). However, the minimum of g(x) is = 0, and it occurs at x = 1, while the minimum of f(x) is = 0.2892734 and it occurs at x = 0.5897545 (as obtained using numerical methods). So, in this case, minimizing f by minimizing the simpler function g would fail. However, if I change f to f(x) = x2 + x4 and g(x) to g(x) = x2, we would get the correct answer by minimizing g instead of f.

So, sometimes your method works and sometimes it fails. The issue is whether you can apply it in your particular problem.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
I have already explained why your reasoning is incomplete: you have some expression A that you want to minimize, and you know that A ≥ B for some other expression B. Minimizing B does not necessarily minimize A.

For example, if f(x) = (x-1)2+ x4 and g(x) = (x-1)2, we certainly have f(x) ≥ g(x) for all x (and f = g for some x). However, the minimum of g(x) is = 0, and it occurs at x = 1, while the minimum of f(x) is = 0.2892734 and it occurs at x = 0.5897545 (as obtained using numerical methods). So, in this case, minimizing f by minimizing the simpler function g would fail. However, if I change f to f(x) = x2 + x4 and g(x) to g(x) = x2, we would get the correct answer by minimizing g instead of f.

So, sometimes your method works and sometimes it fails. The issue is whether you can apply it in your particular problem.

RGV

Hmmm... that seems quite correct. Thanks
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top