What Temp is an Object Orbiting the Sun?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pkalmond
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hot Sky
AI Thread Summary
An object like a tin can orbiting the Sun at Earth's distance would experience temperature variations between -160ºC and over 200ºC, depending on whether it is sunlit or shaded. In deep space, far from thermal influences, the temperature would drop to approximately 4 K due to cosmic background radiation. The Earth maintains a stable temperature by absorbing and emitting energy in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings. Therefore, a tin can in thermal equilibrium with Earth would have a similar average temperature. Understanding these temperature dynamics is crucial for spacecraft design and operation.
pkalmond
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
An object (a tin can for example) orbiting the Sun at about the same distance as the Earth would be what temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is really not a question about the sky is it :)

In any region close to the Earth, the temperature can vary from about -160ºC to over 200ºC, based on Table 11-43 "Typical Operating Temperature Ranges for Selected Spacecraft Components," from "Space Mission Analysis and Design," Wertz and Larson (eds) Kluwer 1999, ISBN 1884883108.

the variation depends on if it is sunlit or shaded
when you get away from any thermal influence of the sun or other body, ie. deep space, the temperature drops to the cosmic background radiation temp of ~ 4 K

Dave
 
Sure it's a question about the sky. If the Earth is at a stable temperature that means that it absorbs about as much energy from it's surroundings (the sky) as it emits.

Earth is at thermal equilibrium with with it's surroundings (more or less), so when the tin can is in thermal equilibrium it will be at the same average temperature.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top