Electric Charge- why is the electron the negative

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why electrons are assigned a negative charge instead of a positive one, highlighting that this convention was established before the electron was discovered, largely due to Benjamin Franklin's influence. It suggests that changing this convention could simplify understanding of electronics, as it would align the direction of electron flow with positive charge. However, some argue that the sign of the majority charge carrier is not crucial for grasping the fundamentals of electricity. The conversation also touches on the tendency to adhere to conventions for their own sake, similar to the reluctance to adopt the metric system in the U.S. Ultimately, the choice of charge sign is seen as arbitrary and not fundamentally impacting the study of electricity.
coffeebird
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Why wasn't the electron fixed with the 'positive' value? wouldn't that simplify a lot of issues with electronics problems, i mean, that way things wouldn't have to be all backwards. like, wherever the electrons go is becoming more negative, and whichever direction they are leaving is more positive...etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the convention was established before the electron was discovered. There was a 50-50 chance of getting it right.
 
Blame Benjamin Franklin.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Because the convention was established before the electron was discovered. There was a 50-50 chance of getting it right.


that's what i was thinking...and people do that a lot, just stick with a convention for its own sake ( like not switching to the metric system in the US)
 
I think it's important to realize that one choice of sign is no more "right" than another.
The sign of the majority charge carrier is an insignificant factor in understanding 'electricity'. Anyone who thinks it is of ant consequencr, can't be appreciating the topic in any depth.
 

Thread 'Maxwell stress tensor'

This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
View full post »
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'

Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
View full post »

Similar threads

B How is surface charge accumulated?
Replies
36
Views
6K
B Is there some electrical charge that is neither positive nor negative?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Some Questions about Electric Current/Capacitors to help my understanding
Replies
7
Views
2K
Calculating the force on an electron from two positive point charges
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Question on Hall Effect and magnetic force
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Meaning of "Static Electricity" and Physical Interpretation
Replies
20
Views
2K
How can electrons flow all the way through the circuit?
Replies
21
Views
3K
Help with negative charges in an electric field.
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Why Does Grounding Imply Zero Electric Potential in the Method of Images?
Replies
7
Views
3K
What is the Significance of the Electric field in a closed circuit
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top