Solving Angular Momentum Problem: Why Answer Differs from Book

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a discrepancy in calculating angular momentum for a specific problem, with the user obtaining a different answer than the textbook. The user applies the formula L=Iω, using a moment of inertia I=((M+m)l^2) for a block, but arrives at L=vlM+vlm, while the book states L=mvl. Suggestions for resolving the issue include double-checking calculations, ensuring correct variable values, and considering conservation of linear momentum. It's noted that different approaches or assumptions in problem-solving can lead to varied yet valid answers. Understanding both solutions and consulting with a knowledgeable source may clarify the confusion.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
The problem is http://home.earthlink.net/~urban-xrisis/clip002.jpg .

I got a different answer from what my book tells me and I want to know why. Angular momentum is:
L=I \omega
So... the moment of inertia for the block would be:
I=((M+m)l^2)
since the rod has negligible mass, it will not have a moment of inertia.
\omega=v/r=v/l
L=\frac{(M+m)l^2v}{l}
L=vlM+vlm

my text gives an answer of L=mvl
I don't understand what I misunderstood
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
UrbanXrisis said:
my text gives an answer of L=mvl
I don't understand what I misunderstood

Try again without assuming that the block/bullet combination are moving at the same speed as the original bullet. You'll need to consider conservation of linear momentum.
 
.

There could be a few reasons why your answer differs from what is given in the book. First, it is possible that there is a mistake in either your calculation or in the book. Double check your calculations and make sure you are using the correct formulas and units. Also, make sure you are using the correct values for the variables (mass, length, velocity) in the problem.

Another possibility is that the book is using a different approach or simplification in their solution. They may be assuming certain conditions or ignoring certain factors that you have taken into account. It would be helpful to compare your solution step by step with the one given in the book to see where the differences arise.

Lastly, it is important to note that there can be multiple ways to solve a physics problem and still arrive at the correct answer. It is possible that both your solution and the one given in the book are correct, but just differ in their approach or assumptions. In this case, it would be worthwhile to understand the reasoning behind both solutions and see if they can be reconciled. Consulting with your professor or a tutor can also help you better understand the problem and arrive at the correct solution.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top