How Does the Angle of an Incline Affect the Time of Descent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VooDoo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on investigating how the angle of an incline affects the time taken to descend. The formula used is x = ut + 0.5at², with specific values substituted to explore the relationship between height (angle) and time. The user seeks to establish a direct proportionality between time (t) and the angle (Φ) to create a straight line graph. Suggestions include plotting t against (sin Φ)^(1/2) and (sin Φ)^(-1/2) to achieve linearity, with the latter yielding a more consistent result. The conversation also touches on using logarithmic transformations to analyze the relationship further.
VooDoo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

For a physics practical investigation I will be investigating the change in height (angle) of an inclined plane and the time taken to travel down the incline.
Now for my hypothesis and results I am a bit stuck. For the hypothesis I will be using the following formula.

x=ut+.5at^2

Where:
x=distance down the incline plane (meters)
u=Initial velocity (m/s)
t=time taken to travel down (seconds)
a=acceleration down the incline plane (m/s/s meters per second per second)

Now for our situation
x=1.58
u=0
t=?
a=gSinΦ (Φ varies with different heights)

So now I can build a relationship between the height (or the angle of inclination) and the time taken to travel.

Now I substitute values into the formula to get:

x=.5at^2 (because u=0)

Then transpose:
2x=at^2
t^2=(2x)/(gsinΦ)

Now we know that the values of 2x and g (g = 9.8 = acceleration due to gravity) remain constant (well we assume they do). How do I create a direct proportionality between t and Φ ?? So I get a straight line graph when I plot the two?

Have I gone about things the wrong way?

Edit - Here is a graph of the angle versus time
 

Attachments

  • Angle-Time.gif
    Angle-Time.gif
    4.8 KB · Views: 535
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could simply plot t vs. (sin Φ)^1/2 to give you a straight line.
 
Nylex said:
You could simply plot t vs. (sin Φ)^1/2 to give you a straight line.
Hi Nylex,
is t on the vertical axis or horizontal axis?

I ploted (sinΦ)^1/2 but that just gives me a curved graph. Then I ploted (sinΦ)^-1/2 which gave me a sort of straight graph. Have I found proportionality? I got the excel spreadsheet if anyone needs it?
 
Last edited:
Given x and g to be constants your function will become
t^2 = (2x/g) * sin(phi)
t = (2x/g)^.5 * sin(phi)^.5

(2x/g)^.5 is just a scalar coefficient, don't worry about it.

Your function is reflecting the relationship t = sin(phi)^.5, there shouldn't be a linear trend because the relationship si the square root of a periodic function, so at the least it will curve. You could try logarithms in which case

log t = (log sin(phi))/2, that should be somewhat linear.
 
Hi whozum,

Is that log base to e or log base to 10?
 
Any base will work just as long as you use the same base for both sides.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top