Interpretation of QED in the Standard Model

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
Three related questions on which I could use some help:

a] In another thread, Bill_k posted something like:

"Electrons, being charged, could exchange energy by exchanging a virtual photon."

ok, yet I thought electrons usually interacted via the EM field ['real' photons]...

So how do we distinguish between when virtual photon versus and real photon exchange occurs? I started reading Wikipedia to see if I could find out and decided to post here because I got confused:

b] Wikipedia in the QED introduction says

...QED mathematically describes all phenomena involving electrically charged particles interacting by means of exchange of photons and represents the quantum counterpart of classical electromagnetism giving a complete account of matter and light interaction. ...

Does this mean the exchange of virtual photons lies outside QED?

A few sentences later in Wikipedia:

c]
...In technical terms, QED can be described as a perturbation theory of the electromagnetic quantum vacuum.

Is that correct?

I thought the the Standard Model involves quantum field theory of NON-perturbative behavior; That is, where the vacuum has a non zero vacuum expectation value...For example I have read Higgs and QCD are a/w NON perturbative vacuums...QED is different??

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Regarding my own question [c]..Wikipedia sez...

Vacuum energy is the zero-point energy of all the fields in space, which in the Standard Model includes the electromagnetic field, other gauge fields, fermionic fields, and the Higgs field.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy

apparently I am more confused than I suspected!?? but they all seem to be treated on the same basis...
 
This post is a spin-off of the original post that discussed Barandes theory, A new realistic stochastic interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, for any details about the interpretation in general PLEASE look up for an answer there. Now I want this post to focus on this pre-print: J. A. Barandes, "New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory", arXiv 2402.16935 (2024) My main concerns are that Barandes thinks this deflates the anti-classical Bell's theorem. In Barandes...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Back
Top