Ultimate Strength vs. Young's modulus

AI Thread Summary
Young's modulus is applicable only within the elastic limit of a material, which is defined by the yield stress, beyond which ultimate strength becomes relevant. Ultimate strength indicates the maximum stress a material can withstand before failure, while Young's modulus describes the linear relationship between stress and strain in the elastic region. The elastic limit is determined experimentally, typically through tensile tests that measure stress and strain until fracture occurs. For design purposes, it is crucial to keep stresses below the yield stress, often adjusted by a safety factor. Understanding these concepts is essential for evaluating material behavior under different loading conditions.
AJKing
Messages
104
Reaction score
2
What is the threshold where Young's modulus stops being applicable, and ultimate strength becomes relevant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The limit on the applicability of Young's modulus is called the 'elastic limit' or the 'yield stress', sometimes the 'tensile yield stress'.

Generally, the ultimate strength is only used when trying to figure the load which produces complete failure of the material.

For most design purposes, it is desirable to keep stresses below the yield stress, divided by the factor of safety. There are some designs where the stresses are greater than yield, but these are evaluated using plastic analysis methods.
 
How do we describe the elastic limit?
Is that solely based on experimental results?

A.P French said, in Vibrations and Waves, that "Young's Modulus represents a stress corresponding to a 100% elongation a condition that is never approached in the actual stretching of a sample. Failure occurs [...] at strain values of between 0.1 and 1%."

I'm getting confused information.

From You and the internet, I understand:

  • For every stress below the elastic limit there is an existing strain in linear proportion
  • For stresses at or above the elastic limit, the material is plastic and there is no simple description for its deformation.
  • The ultimate strength is the maximum point on the stress-strain curve - with no other significance.

From A.P. French, I understand that:

  • Young's modulus is only applicable for lengths below ~1% of l0
  • Ultimate strength is the description of the material at "failure" (fracture?)
  • [strike]If strain is equal to (U / Y)%, then one may solve problems with ultimate strength[/strike]

How am I doing?
 
Last edited:
Young's modulus is the slope of the stress-strain curve in the elastic region. The tensile limit for a particular material is determined by an experiment called a 'tensile test'. A carefully prepared sample of the material is put into a machine which is capable of pulling on both ends of the sample. The sample usually has the shape of a cylinder in the middle. As the sample is pulled, the pulling force is measured as is the elongation of the sample. Knowing the dimensions of the sample, the stress and the strain are calculated and plotted. The test continues until the sample is pulled apart. If the test is done correctly, the first portion of the plotted curve will be a straight line, which indicates elastic behavior.

The link gives more details: http://dolbow.cee.duke.edu/TENSILE/tutorial/node1.html
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top