Physics Forums Crackpot Index - Comments

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a "Crackpot Index" as a humorous tool for identifying posts that may contain fringe or unconventional scientific claims. Participants explore the nature of "crackpots" within the Physics Forums community, sharing anecdotes and suggestions related to identifying and categorizing such posts. The scope includes humor, community dynamics, and the challenges of moderating unconventional ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest the Crackpot Index could serve as a fun detector for identifying unconventional claims in posts.
  • One participant humorously notes scoring points on the index for a personal experience, indicating a playful engagement with the concept.
  • Several participants express curiosity about past "Own research" forums and the nature of deleted topics, indicating a desire to explore historical discussions on fringe science.
  • There is a suggestion that certain times of day may yield more "crackpot" posts due to the availability of moderators.
  • Some participants propose the idea of a dedicated sub-forum for those labeled as crackpots, allowing them to interact while others observe.
  • One participant humorously suggests that claiming Newton was wrong should carry a higher point value on the index.
  • Another participant raises the idea of a "Crackpot Award" to recognize humorous contributions, although others note the fleeting nature of such posts makes it impractical.
  • There is a playful discussion about the use of sockpuppets and their effectiveness in online discussions.
  • A participant creatively describes the "Crackpot" as a rare creature facing extinction due to moderation efforts, using humorous and metaphorical language to illustrate the phenomenon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share a humorous perspective on the topic, but there are varying opinions on the effectiveness and implications of the Crackpot Index and the nature of moderation in the forums. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best methods for identifying and categorizing unconventional claims.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the criteria for identifying crackpot ideas and the effectiveness of the index, indicating a lack of consensus on how to approach the topic.

Messages
19,881
Reaction score
10,890
This is primarily for fun, but given our experiences here at PF, it could be an excellent crackpot detector tool! Next time you read a post that sounds a bit off, refer to this index. It was compiled by PF staff and science advisors. The higher the point value, the greater the chance it's crackpot!

Read the index here
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
...
50 points: "I just discovered the laws of physics are wrong"
...

I just got 50 points in my kitchen this morning. But then again, it might be my FBD.

ps. Can you give that new kid, Emigman, half an infraction point for me. My kitchen is a mess!

pf.bucky.cubes.and.meniscus.problem.experiment.2013.09.08.1220pm.jpg
 
I've read a lot about those so called "crackpots". However, I never found one here. I know there used to be a "Own research" or whatever it was called forum here, on PF, and that it was a festival for the "quacks" (?). Is there, perhaps, some lost topic, so I can read it? Link me!
 
Crake said:
I've read a lot about those so called "crackpots". However, I never found one here. I know there used to be a "Own research" or whatever it was called forum here, on PF, and that it was a festival for the "quacks" (?). Is there, perhaps, some lost topic, so I can read it? Link me!
You generally need to be lucky to catch one before it gets deleted. Personally I've found hours around 8AM-1PM GMT the most abundant, as it would appear the mentors and admins are in their temporary unconsciousness/regeneration phase of life cycle around that time.

It would be fun to be able to access the deleted topics, if only to amuse yourself by playing micromass' bingo.
 
Bandersnatch said:
You generally need to be lucky to catch one before it gets deleted.

True, we have an expert team of crackpot hunters. They generally look like this

attachment.php?attachmentid=140215&d=1377626442.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ComplexVar89
Bandersnatch said:
You generally need to be lucky to catch one before it gets deleted. Personally I've found hours around 8AM-1PM GMT the most abundant, as it would appear the mentors and admins are in their temporary unconsciousness/regeneration phase of life cycle around that time.

It would be fun to be able to access the deleted topics, if only to amuse yourself by playing micromass' bingo.

In which sub-forums does one catch that? General Discussion?
 
Crake said:
In which sub-forums does one catch that? General Discussion?

Usually the "Physics" or "Astro/Cosmo" forums
 
Bandersnatch said:
You generally need to be lucky to catch one before it gets deleted. Personally I've found hours around 8AM-1PM GMT the most abundant, as it would appear the mentors and admins are in their temporary unconsciousness/regeneration phase of life cycle around that time.

That's true for some of them but for the rest of us those times are closer to our mornings at work :wink: in other words there is a time when the west-Atlanticans are asleep and the east-Atlanticans are at work so mentoring gets a bit patchy.
 
5 points: Putting mentors / science advisors on ignore.

wow...

Is that like an auto-eject button on a James Bond car?
 
  • #10
I think claiming Newton was wrong should be 100 pts at the least xP
 
  • #11
I think it would be funny if you locked their account into a specific sub-forum (so that they can use PF, but only on that sub-forum).. A locked sub-forum, only those who get "labeled" as crackpots by mentors are allowed to post there. However, everyone else is allowed to read!

It would be amazing seeing them argument with one another, haha.
 
  • #12
WannabeNewton said:
I think claiming Newton was wrong should be 100 pts at the least xP

Then Einstein would get 100 crackpot points instead of 30.
 
  • #13
They sometimes seem to come in bunches, right around the time of the full moon. For some reason, this weekend has produced at lot of zombies posting, but I guess the moon must be full somewhere.
 
  • #14
Gee. I wonder if someone could use the whole list in a post. The ultimate crackpot.
 
  • #15
This looks like a fine sticky topic in the psychology sub-forum.
 
  • #16
yeah. It would be worthwhile to investigate whether the person suffering from crackpotitis is displaying symptoms of the acute or chronic progression of the disease. Is it of a hereditary nature. Or even contagious in which case how does one go about protecting oneself from becoming contaminated with the pathogen. Is there an incubation periiod during which time an individaul can become a carrier, to the time to a full blown progression. Is there a cure in sight. IMHO there is little understanding of its nature as there are a good many questions with very few answers.
At the very least we have a list of the symptoms to look for when suspecting someone is a sufferer.

When in doubt, though it would be best to contact your friendly neigborhood physicist for a proper and qualified diagnosis, and recommended treatment.
 
  • #17
"I need some help to express this in maths."

"Maths isn't the right tool for thinking about this."

I have seen an example of the latter where he preferred a system of drawing arrows and adding them together. Apparently the arrows were completely unlike vectors (notably, they lacked an underlying system of rigorous thought - or indeed any thought at all).
 
  • #18
Greg Bernhardt said:
5 points: Obvious copy and paste
5 points: Wall of Text
20 points: No math shown

Desperate measures
5 points: Post offers a complicated analogy rather than a descriptive model

So 35 points for the OP so far.. ^^
 
  • #19
Digitalism said:
So 35 points for the OP so far.. ^^

haha yes, 35 points is not too bad though :D
 
  • #20
Can we have a Crackpot Award to go with awards like Community Spirit and Most Humorous?
 
  • #21
Pythagorean said:
Can we have a Crackpot Award to go with awards like Community Spirit and Most Humorous?

First few years we did have one, but since they don't stick around long, it doesn't make sense. :D
 
  • #22
Greg Bernhardt said:
50 points: Creating a sockpuppet to agree with you.

Man, that's sure a sad and desperate measure. But it's an entertaining thought. Sadly I know such things can happen. I've tried using sock puppets elsewhere, but they never agreed with me :confused:.
 
  • #23
sock puppets aren't very convincing without googly eyes; but then you just ruin a good pair of socks.
 
  • #24
Bandersnatch said:
You generally need to be lucky to catch one before it gets deleted. Personally I've found hours around 8AM-1PM GMT the most abundant, as it would appear the mentors and admins are in their temporary unconsciousness/regeneration phase of life cycle around that time.

Couldn't help laughing when I read this, Bandersnatch. This sounded like something from David Attenborough's documentaries.
 
  • #25
OmCheeto said:
I just got 50 points in my kitchen this morning. But then again, it might be my FBD.

ps. Can you give that new kid, Emigman, half an infraction point for me. My kitchen is a mess!

Who's that? :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #26
DennisN said:
The Crackpot is nowadays a rare sight on the Physics Forums. This magnificent creature, once ubiquitous in this part of the web, is facing extinction due to overhunting by the local admins.

Crackpots are omnivorous scavengers, sustaining themselves on any fringe science readily available in the environment. However, their digestive system tends to specialise with age, forcing them to maintain their chosen dietary composition throughout the latter part of life.

Characteristic of a Crakpot is the vacuous misinformation it extrudes to attract other members of the species, or when faced with predation. It is a substance resembling common science, if only under the most superificial scrutiny. When viewed under a microscope, however, it shows significant lack of coherence, while the reasoning lattice is ridden with sizeable holes, often arranged in aesthetically-pleasing patterns.
The exact composition of misinformation varies depending on the particulars of a Crackpot's diet, the prevalence of education in its breeding area, and the size of its ego glands.

In certain parts of the world, the misinformation is sought after by unscrupulous individuals, who collect and further disseminate it among the general populace. Thought to be a multi-million pound market, misinformation is sold in book and television programme form semi-openly, often under the guise of reputable science. Yet, despite the known adverse effects of its use, especially among the young and impressionable minds, the sale of misinformation remains a gray area both ethically and within the confines of the law.

While in the wild the Crackpot is nearly bereft of natural predators, only rarely stalked by the members of genus Professoria Academica, it is considered a pest by admins of scientific forums. Often killed on sight, traditionally with the ritual tribal weapon called "the banhammer".
It is hard to argue against the reasoning behind such a strict behaviour, as the crops cultivated by science forums are, without doubt, adversely affected by the Crackpot's misinformation. An unchecked infestation can easily spoil any valid discussion, subsequently requiring an inordinate amount of work to weed out the impurities.

As a result, the population of feral Crackpots dwindles in places like Physics Forums. Their future fate either starvation, or capture by the aforementioned misinformation cartels.
And even though there are other factors behind their seemingly inevitable extinction, including the widespread adoption of educational pesticides, or poaching by debunking websites, the actions of admins are certainly among the most immediate of threats.

So, should you ever see the wild Crackpot rear its magnificent head from between the neatly trimmed lines of scientific topics, take a picture. Copy and paste. Save the memory of the nature's exuberance for posterity.

CoeufXt.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcusl, lisab and Greg Bernhardt
  • #27
Bandersnatch said:
You generally need to be lucky to catch one before it gets deleted.

Sometimes we do leave one of their threads around, if they took a subtle approach so we didn't recognize them immediately, and there was useful discussion in the meantime. For example:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=708068
 
  • #28
Bandersnatch said:
The Crackpot...

:smile:
 
  • #29
zoobyshoe said:
Then Einstein would get 100 crackpot points instead of 30.

OK, I'll bite. Where exactly did Einstein proclaimed that Newton was wrong? Incomplete, an approximation, sure. But wrong? Would someone proclaim that and then write a tribute such as this?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/einstein-on-Newton.html

Zz.
 
  • #30
greg said:
Claiming Newton is wrong
In that case are you claiming that Sir Newt On was right on the account that light was composed of particles then it would travel faster in a denser medium like water but if it were composed of waves, then a denser medium would slow it down while he maintained that light was particles, not waves...chalk me up 60 points :biggrin:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
24K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K