Does time go backwards if object is going faster than light?

adimantium
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Lets pretend I am in my spaceship going in one direction at 0.9c. My brother is in his spaceship going the opposite direction also at 0.9c. Oh and there is a big clock on the side of our ships. When we cross paths, to me it looks as if I'm not moving and my brother is moving at 1.8c. I am aware that the formula for time dilation is t0 = t√1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} and that velocities don't simply add together, the formula for that is V_{3} = \frac{v_{1}+v_{2}}{1+\frac{v_{1}v_{2}}{c^{2}}}. Using that formula for velocity the speed would be about 0.9945c. this only makes sense to me if the two velocities are in the same direction. So let's just forget the formula for velocity. I see my brother moving faster than light. Let's also pretend I have some kind of telescope that can perceive vision instantaneously. Using the time dilation formula, I would be left with t√-0.8 I know you can't really find the square root of a negative number, so what would I see? Would I see his clock run slow but forward like normal, not move at all, or backwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
adimantium said:
I am aware that the formula for time dilation is t0 = t√1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}} and that velocities don't simply add together, the formula for that is V_{3} = \frac{v_{1}+v_{2}}{1+\frac{v_{1}v_{2}}{c^{2}}}. Using that formula for velocity the speed would be about 0.9945c. this only makes sense to me if the two velocities are in the same direction. So let's just forget the formula for velocity.
No, please don't forget it! It's correct. The formula the way you've written it assumes that the velocities are in the opposite direction. Moreover there's a recent thread which discusses how to add velocities that are in any direction.
 
You can't just "forget" the formula for velocity addition. That's the way velocities add. So you don't see your brother traveling faster than light.

On a related note, nothing goes faster than light so you cannot perceive faster than light. It's common practice to imply that all players in an experiment are smart enough to subtract out lightspeed delay, which can confuse some students. But if something happens a light year away, we cannot know about it for a year.

So: you would see his clock running slow because of time dilation, but sped up (as he approaches) or slowed even more (as he moves away) because of the Doppler effect. You would never see the clock running backwards, or showing an imaginary time.
 
adimantium said:
So let's just forget the formula for velocity. I see my brother moving faster than light.
You do not see your brother moving faster than light. That formula that you want to forget is precisely what you need to use to explain why you see your brother moving at a speed less than the speed of light.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top