What is the v(p) polynomial in radial wave function

lonewolf219
Messages
186
Reaction score
2
I think the solution to the radial schrodinger equation includes a form of the Laguerre polynomials, the polynomial v(ρ). Does anyone know what this v(ρ) polynomial is called? The only information my book gives is: "The polynomial v(ρ) is a function well known to applied mathematicians."

Also, I noticed that when solving for the coefficients of v(ρ), we used a quantity called j_{max}=n-l-1. Then the value of j_{max} would coincide with the degree of the polynomial. But why does the degree of the polynomial depend on the values of quantum numbers n and l?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lonewolf219 said:
I think the solution to the radial schrodinger equation includes a form of the Laguerre polynomials, the polynomial v(ρ). Does anyone know what this v(ρ) polynomial is called? The only information my book gives is: "The polynomial v(ρ) is a function well known to applied mathematicians."
They're known as associated Laguerre polynomials.

lonewolf219 said:
Also, I noticed that when solving for the coefficients of v(ρ), we used a quantity called j_{max}=n-l-1. Then the value of j_{max} would coincide with the degree of the polynomial. But why does the degree of the polynomial depend on the values of quantum numbers n and l?
It's the other way around, isn't it? The relationship states that the quantum number n depends on ℓ and jmax.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks Bill_K for the reply... I appreciate it!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top