Lorentz Transformation and Time Dilation

SteveDC
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I've managed to confuse myself and don't understand the difference between the formula for Lorentz time transformation (t'=γ(t-vx/c^2) and the time dilation equation t'=γ(t_proper)

As I understand, proper time is difference between two events that happen in same place in a given reference frame.

So what do the t's relate to in the Lorentz transformation equation as they must be something different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the Lorentz transformation equations, t is the time coordinate of a single event in one inertial reference frame (IRF). t' is the time coordinate of the same event in a different IRF, that is moving with respect to the first one with velocity v.

In the time dilation formula, t is the time interval between two events that occur at the same location in one IRF, and t' is the time interval between the same two events in a different IRF, that is moving with respect to the first one with velocity v.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Makes sense - Thanks
 
We can write the transformation for the interval between two events like this:

Δt'=γ(Δt-vΔx/c^2)

if Δt is the interval between two events at the same location in S, then xΔ=0 and the time interval measured in S' is then:

Δt'=γ(Δt)

Δt is the proper time measured in S and Δt' is the coordinate time measured in S'. However, if we calculate the transformation to S' of the spatial interval between the same two events we get:

Δx'=γ(Δx-vΔt)

Since we defined Δx as zero in S, and if Δt is non zero, then we get:

Δx'=γ(vΔt) ≠ 0

which means the two events do not occur in the same place in S' and that is why it is called a coordinate time interval and not a proper time interval in S'.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top