How Do You Transform Electromagnetic Dipole Moments When Boosting Orthogonally?

kuecken
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I just wondered how I transform electromagnetic dipole moments.
For example assuming I have magnetic dipole moment μ in a frame without E dipole moment. Then I boost orthogonal to μ. Now I would like to determine the electric dipole moment.

I could use the magnetic potential and transform it to the new frame. But this quiet tedious to me.
My second guess was to argue that there is a linear dependence of the magnetic fields on μ.
And the E field in the new frame will also have a linear dependence on B and thus on μ. By looking at the boost component I could also find a relation. But this would assume that I have an electric dipole moment in the new frame.

I just wondered whether there is any easier and more elegant method.
I would be very glad about any advise.
Thank you :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a thought: writing the Lagrangian in terms of moments.
 
It's just better to start from covariant expressions. As the electromagnetic field itself the electric and magnetic dipole moment densities build an antisymmetric 2nd-rank tensor in Minkowski space-time:

M^{\alpha \beta}=\begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; P_1 &amp; P_2 &amp; P_3 \\ <br /> -P_1 &amp; 0 &amp; -M_3 &amp; M_2 \\<br /> -P_2 &amp; M_3 &amp; 0 &amp; -M_1 \\<br /> -P_3 &amp; -M_2 &amp; M_1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{pmatrix},
where \vec{P} and \vec{M} are the electric and magnetic dipole density vector fields of the 1+3-dimensional formalism.

They transform under Lorentz transformations as any other 2nd rank tensor components
M&#039;^{\gamma \delta} = {\Lambda^{\gamma}}_{\alpha} {\Lambda^{\delta}}_{\beta} M^{\alpha \beta}.
 
oh really? I was looking for sth like this. that's good thank you!
 
Magnetization-polarization tensor I found it now
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top