Interference of Waves, Sound Diminution

AI Thread Summary
A manufacturing firm is addressing employee complaints about a loud 1400 Hz hum from machinery and seeks solutions to reduce sound reflection. Acoustical Consulting proposes installing mesh screens in front of the walls to minimize sound reflections, allowing some sound to pass through while reflecting the rest. The discussion includes a technical analysis of phase differences in sound waves, concluding that the phase difference is zero due to the nature of wave inversion when transitioning between different densities. The proposed distance for the mesh installation is calculated to be 7.15 cm, based on sound wave principles. The conversation also seeks examples of effective mesh materials that can significantly reflect sound.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
A manufacturing firm has hired your company, Acoustical Consulting, to help with a problem. Their employees are complaining about the annoying hum from a piece of machinery. Using a frequency meter, you quickly determine that the machine emits a rather loud sound at 1400 Hz. After investigating, you tell the owner that you cannot solve the problem entirely, but you can at least improve the situation by eliminating reflections of this sound from the walls. You propose to do this by installing mesh screens in front of the walls. A portion of the sound will reflect from the mesh; the rest will pass through the mesh and reflect from the wall.How far should the mesh be placed in front of the wall for this scheme to work?

I have the answer right in front of me, along with the steps. But the solution manual just mentions that Δø0 (the phase difference) is simply 0. Can you check my reasoning of why it is 0? The sound wave gets into the mesh (-pi reversal for the reflected wave) and then reflects on the wall (-pi reversal again for the reflected wave on the wall). So, when sound waves go from denser to less dense areas, the waves don't get inverted. They do get inverted when they from less dense to dense.

So, because the waves that are traveling away from the wall are inverted, they have 0 phase difference? Right?

If anyone wants to solve the problem just for kicks, the answer is 7.15 cm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the line of thinking I would have used.

I'd like to see (i.e., hear) the scheme in action. Where can I glimpse a mesh that reflects a significant percentage of incident sound?
 
use the speed of sound to solve for wavelength. Then because technically the wall and the air is a close-open tube, you can say 4L = wavelength to solve for L.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top