Difference between timelike and space like events

clumps tim
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
hi, I need an explanatory difference between timelike and space like events . examples will do, i know the mathematics
regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, an event by itself is neither timelike or spacelike. You have to have a pair of events and then the spacetime interval between those two events can be timelike or spacelike or null, depending on the specific events.

Recall that an event has four coordinate, one of time and three of space. If the two events in question can be occupied by a single small inertial object with mass, such as a clock, then the spacetime interval is timelike and the period measured by the clock is the interval.

If it is not possible for a massive object to be present at both events, then the question is can a ruler measure the spatial distance between the two event such that the time coordinates for the two events are equal. In this case the spacetime interval is spacelike and the ruler measures the interval.

If neither of the above are true, then the spacetime interval is null, meaning that it isn't either of the above. Sometimes it is called lightlike, meaning that a photon can be present at both events.

It's important to realize that the spacetime interval for any two events is either a space interval or a time interval or it's not an interval.
 
No such thing - events are points in space-time and so are neither time-like nor space-like.
If you know the maths then you already know the difference between time-like and space-like intervals.
JIC: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=195101

[edit] beaten to it :)
 
An event in itself cannot be time- or space-like. This is a property of a pair of events that can have time- or space-like separation. Time-like separated events are within each other's light cones and will always occur at different times in all frames while events with space-like separation are outside of each other's light cones and will be at different spatial points in all frames.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top