The square of an orbital period

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the square of the orbital period, T^2, from the formula T = 2*pi*R^(3/2)/sqrt(G*M). By squaring the original equation, the result is T^2 = 4*pi^2*R^3/G*M. This formulation simplifies the variables, allowing for a clearer representation of the relationship between the orbital period and the semi-major axis. The expression is rooted in Kepler's third law, emphasizing that the square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis. This derivation aids in calculating the orbital period for various celestial objects based on their mass and distance.
badman
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
this is the expression ofr the orbital period T= 2*pi*R^(3/2)/sqrt(G*M) that i found
now the next question asks me to find an expression for T^2=?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is fairly simple...

If x = y*z^(3/2)
Then x^2 = y^2*z^3

If you simply square the expression on the right hand side of your equation
you should get the answer quite easily.

The reason why you are probably asked to find T^2 is because...
If you notice there are a lot of variables that are not raised to an integer power. In order to make the expression look more "pretty" it is better to write our variables in terms of integer powers as opposed to something raised to the 3/2 power or the square root.

I.E. sometimes its more conveinant to write a^2 = b rahter than a = sqrt(b)
 


The expression for T^2 would be T^2 = (2*pi*R^(3/2)/sqrt(G*M))^2 = 4*pi^2*R^3/G*M. This expression represents the square of the orbital period, which is a measure of the time it takes for an object to complete one full orbit around another object. It is derived from Kepler's third law, which states that the square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of the orbit. This expression is useful in calculating the orbital period for different objects, as it takes into account the mass and distance between the objects.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top