Calculating Time Length of Train and Wall Intersection

  • Thread starter Thread starter dnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Train Wall
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the time it takes for a wall, sloping at 12 degrees, to appear in a train window measuring 0.9 m high and 2.0 m wide while traveling at 3.0 m/s. The approach taken involved creating a triangle to determine the vertical distance the wall travels within the window, resulting in a total distance of 6.23 m when accounting for the window's width. This distance was then divided by the train's speed to yield a time of approximately 2.078 seconds, which aligns closely with the book's answer of 2.1 seconds. The poster expresses uncertainty about their method and seeks validation of their logic. The discussion highlights challenges in visualizing the problem and the importance of clarity in physics problem-solving.
dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
dont know how else to word the title but here's the problem:

you are in a train traveling on a straight and flat track (just assume its going right to left for my explanation) at 3.0 m/s. your window is 0.9 m high by 2.0 m wide and as you look out, the wall is going up at a 12 degree slope. the question is what is the time length between when the wall appears at the bottom of your window til it leaves at the top?

the way i did it was i created a triangle (with angle 12) and assumed that the wall had to "travel" 0.9 m up my window of sight.

from there i calculated the bottom part of this triangle using trig to get 4.23 m.

however, i also needed to add in the length of the window itself since you could see the wall from either end (i assume you start looking at the window from the far left end and as it travels look out the right end to maximize how long you can see it). so i added 2.0 m to that length to get 6.23 m.

then just divide by 3.0 m/s to get the time 2.078 s. answer in book states 2.1 sec.

i just don't think my logic is right however. i think i just got lucky and actually didnt do it the right way. the question is so difficult for me to visualize so that i can correctly solve it.

help. thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even with a thread telling people not to post things like this in the General Physics section, we are still getting them there. What else is there to do when a simple and obvious message like that is either ignored or missed?

Zz.
 
sorry. won't do it again.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top