Fluid Mechs: Find Min Mass for Barge Stability

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kenny Lee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum mass that can be added to a barge without compromising its stability, specifically in relation to metacentric height. The user encountered a non-real solution while setting the equations, raising questions about its commonality. It is noted that non-real solutions can indicate that the barge is already at maximum stability, or that there may be errors in the calculations or assumptions made. To resolve the issue, it is recommended to review the equations and assumptions or to test different parameters. Overall, careful verification of the calculations is essential for accurate results in fluid mechanics.
Kenny Lee
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hi there!
If anyone out there knows fluid mechs... please help out. Simple question on the stability of a floating body; has to do with the meta-centric height etc.

I was supposed to find the minimum mass which could be placed on top of a barge without causing it to lose stability; so I just set the equations with metacentric height equal to zero.

All I need to know is if acquiring a non-real solution is something 'common'? Cause that's what I got. And if it is, then pls let me know what I shud do. If it is not something 'common', then ignore this thread. I probably did something wrong; I'll just look through it again.

I WOULD post the question and my answer, but its a lot to type. And me not knowing how to use latex... thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-real solutions in this type of problem are not uncommon. It may mean that the barge is already at its maximum stability and no more weight can be added without becoming unstable. It could also mean that a mathematical error was made somewhere in the equations or that the assumptions used to set up the equations were incorrect. The best way to check if there is an error is to go through your equations and assumptions again and make sure everything is correct. You could also try running the equations with different parameters to see if you get a real solution.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top