Today's Bad News? (re: Spirit)

  • Thread starter Labguy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    News
In summary, the rover failed to communicate and went into safe mode. It is still possible that they could bring it back online. NASA is still optimistic about the situation. There is a chance that the rover may have discovered water or ice on Mars.
  • #1
Labguy
Science Advisor
731
7
Today's Bad News?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=1&u=/ap/20040122/ap_on_sc/mars_rover_27

Bummer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Dammit!
 
  • #3
Now if they'd had a human being there...
 
  • #4
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Now if they'd had a human being there...
...he'd be dead.
 
  • #5
Originally posted by russ_watters
...he'd be dead.
Hopefully they'd have the foresight to equip him with a space suit as well!

- Warren
 
  • #6
Originally posted by chroot
Hopefully they'd have the foresight to equip him with a space suit as well!

- Warren
If he did have one, he could pull it back out of the pool of water they were looking for, dry it off and email "Eureka!"
 
  • #7
Originally posted by russ_watters
...he'd be dead.

That's certainly a possibility. On the other hand, a human present may have been able to correct a problem not anticipated. Of course since this wasn't a manned mission in the first place, it is probably pointless to wonder what difference it would have made.
 
  • #8
Damn, another one. Hopefully they will repair it somehow.

Two probes in a matter of weeks... I can imagine the alien conspiracy stories already.
 
  • #9
If a human were there he would still be standing staring at his broken equipment tying to contact Earth to tell him what to do. There would not have been any significant amount of real analytical tools because the entire pay load would be devoted to life support systems for the TOURIST. They would totally incapable of doing any significant science because the Tourists would be more flyboys then scientists. Considering the cost of this mission for the limited payload, can you imagine the cost of a mission with a large enough capsule to support say 5 humans?

Until we can prefect Robotic missions sending men along will only result in bodies on Mars or in Space while reducing the amount core scientific information acquired by the mission.

Once we have perfected Robotic missions we can then start to send tourists into space.
 
  • #10
Hear, hear!

$400 million or so may seem expensive, but in any realistic analysis of cost-benefit, robotic science (outside the Earth's atmosphere) wins by many OOM ... even when you include realistic probability of failure.
 
  • #11
If a human were there he would still be standing staring at his broken equipment tying to contact Earth to tell him what to do.

Apollo 13.
 
  • #12
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Apollo 13.

Did not have a communications failure, or they would have been dead.
 
  • #13
Originally posted by enigma
Did not have a communications failure, or they would have been dead.

...and almost were anyway.

As for today's news...

I heard late last night that the rover had failed to communicate just before the Martian sunset. The hope was that after shutting down for the evening it would come back up...as happened with the Viking missions a couple of times.

They still sound somewhat optimistic at NASA...officially...
 
  • #14
The last I read they had gotten a single tone reply to a request, which seemed to indicate that the rover went into safe-mode. This would mean that there is a chance that they could bring it back on line.
 
  • #16
It took a while for the Martians to finish building their duplicate simulated environment to put the rover in.



Njorl
 
  • #17
Originally posted by Njorl
It took a while for the Martians to finish building their duplicate simulated environment to put the rover in.



Njorl
Njorl, I love reading your posts!

On a related (kinda) note. Looks like they confirmed the detection of water/ice on Mars? http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/01/23/mars.water.ice/index.html
 
  • #18
Unfortunately, contact shows us that the Rover is trapped in an endless cycle of rebooting. It starts up, and in the course of going through its normal startup procedures it encounters an anomaly which convinces the onboard computer that it needs to reboot. Then it shuts down and repeats the process.

It seems to me one of the main dangers of this is that the Rover is probably continuing this cycle through the night, when the solar panels are not gathering energy. If the problem is not corrected soon, it could totally drain itself of all power and go permanently dead.
 
Last edited:
  • #19
that sounds like a death sentence to me...
 
  • #20
Uh oh.. sounds like they decided to use Microsoft software... *kidding*

- Warren
 
  • #21
I wonder if there is any plans for missions to inspect the carcases of all the dead hardware now littering the surface of Mars. Might be able learn something about what is happening.
 
  • #22
Do these crafts contain the CD's with names of the two million people who signed up? I wasn't sure which mission was supposed to carry these disks.
 
  • #23
Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
Do these crafts contain the CD's with names of the two million people who signed up? I wasn't sure which mission was supposed to carry these disks.

I believe it does.
 
  • #24
Okay so today (Sat. Jan. 24th) Spirit sent back a stream of data through the Odyssey orbiter. That's the good news, the bad news is it was supposed to be asleep at the time. NASA controllers had sent instructions twice for the orbiter to power down and conserve energy. It didn't.

However, according to http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/spirit_relay_040124.html mission control thinks that they can maintain the Rover's health at its current state "indefinitely". That should give them time to find the solution, if there is one.

Opportunity's landing tonight will be broadcast live over the Internet on NASA TV. If you go to http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/home/index.html there is a link you can click.

I know where I'll be from 11 PM to 1 AM EST!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
And now, two hours later, I've read a report that they think they've isolated the problem. It would appear to be in thwe flash memory, which the rover can operate without. They say it will be a couple of weeks before they can try roving, though.
 
  • #26
Fantastic news!

From the NASA news conference: Assuming that the rover will last much more than ninety days, about which there is high confidence, now they even hope to complete all of the mission's objectives. The failure analysis suggested a particular strategy that yielded the correct response from the rover...so everyone is quite hopeful that they can regain control.
 
  • #27
Originally posted by chroot
Uh oh.. sounds like they decided to use Microsoft software... *kidding*

- Warren

FWIW, Spirit runs on Java. So do I, but the caffeinated kind from Columbia, not the software from Sun Microsystems that Spirit uses. Spirit runs on sun (solar) power too. More standing around than running lately I suppose.

Monday morning brain wanderings...
 
  • #28
Originally posted by Ivan Seeking
From the NASA news conference: Assuming that the rover will last much more than ninety days, about which there is high confidence...
Has a probe ever not exceeded its design life by double? Engineers are always conservative and there is a safety factor on top of that.

Did you guys see that it was essentially stuck in an error->reboot->error->reboot loop? It rebooted like 30 times before they regained control. Glad to see they've got it back now.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
Originally posted by Phobos
FWIW, Spirit runs on Java. So do I, but the caffeinated kind from Columbia, not the software from Sun Microsystems that Spirit uses. Spirit runs on sun (solar) power too. More standing around than running lately I suppose.

Monday morning brain wanderings...

Dammit Phobos, coffee comes from Colombia not Columbia,
have another cup :smile:
 
  • #30
well, I get it mail ordered with my CDs.

mea culpa
 
  • #31
If they did go through with manned-space missions to Mars, I don't think they would be unequipped for fixing problems. They would be equipped to fix everything, when something goes wrong(and it will). Mars is a far way to fly without any tools. How do you think they fix satellites,telescopes?
 
  • #32
Spirit update:
Spirit sent back its first image since the problems started last week. But more repairs are still needed.
 
  • #33
It is the 30th of Jan., and according to http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/spirit_update_040130.html , Spirit has regained scientific capability!

It is expected they will be able to proceed without eliminating the flas memory from the loop. Now let's go RAT a rock!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Related to Today's Bad News? (re: Spirit)

1. Why is there so much bad news in the world today?

There are a variety of factors that contribute to the amount of bad news we see in the media today. These include the 24-hour news cycle, which requires constant updates and can lead to sensationalized reporting, as well as the fact that bad news tends to grab people's attention more than good news. Additionally, with the rise of social media, it is easier for news to spread quickly and for people to be exposed to a wider range of information, including negative events.

2. Is the world becoming a more dangerous place?

It may seem like the world is becoming more dangerous, especially with the constant stream of bad news we see in the media. However, statistically, the world is actually becoming safer in many ways. For example, crime rates have been decreasing in many countries, and advancements in technology have made disasters easier to predict and respond to. It is important to keep in mind that bad news tends to receive more attention, which can skew our perception of the world.

3. Why do we focus on bad news instead of good news?

Our brains are wired to pay more attention to negative information, as it is often seen as a potential threat. This is known as the "negativity bias." In the past, this served as a survival mechanism, but in today's world, it can lead to a disproportionate focus on bad news. Additionally, media outlets often prioritize negative stories because they tend to attract more viewers and generate higher ratings.

4. How does consuming bad news affect our mental health?

Constant exposure to bad news can have a negative impact on our mental health. It can lead to feelings of anxiety, fear, and helplessness, as well as contribute to a sense of hopelessness about the state of the world. It is important to limit our consumption of bad news and balance it with positive and uplifting information to maintain a healthy mindset.

5. Can we do anything to change the amount of bad news we see?

While we cannot control the events that occur in the world, we can choose how much bad news we consume and how we respond to it. It is important to be critical of the sources we get our news from and to seek out diverse perspectives. Additionally, we can actively seek out and share good news and positive stories to counteract the overwhelming amount of bad news in the media.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
65
Views
16K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top