Exploring the Power of Geometric Calculus: Differential Forms in Physics

AI Thread Summary
Geometric calculus, as explored by Dr. David Hestenes, integrates differential forms into physics, highlighting their common roots in Grassmann algebra despite differing historical paths. The paper emphasizes the importance of embedding differential forms within the broader framework of geometric calculus, particularly for applications in relativistic physics, known as Spacetime Calculus. Integral theorems and their relevance to physics, especially electrodynamics, are key topics discussed. While some engineers view differential forms as impractical, their popularity is increasing, with modern texts incorporating them into vector analysis. The discussion underscores the growing recognition of the synergy between geometric calculus and differential forms in advancing physical theories.
laserblue
Messages
62
Reaction score
2
I like the Geometric Algebra approach to incorporating differential forms into physics that is taken by Dr. David Hestenes and contained in his numerous works over the last few decades but see no mention of Geometric Calculus here. Are you familiar with it?

http://geocalc.clas.asu.edu/pdf/DIF_FORM.pdf
"DIFFERENTIAL FORMS IN GEOMETRIC CALCULUS by Dr. David Hestenes

Abstract: Geometric calculus and the calculus of differential forms have common origins in Grassmann algebra but different lines of historical development, so mathematicians have been slow to recognize that they belong together in a single mathematical system. This paper reviews the rationale for embedding differential forms in the more comprehensive system of Geometric Calculus. The most significant application of the system is to relativistic physics where it is referred to as Spacetime Calculus. The fundamental integral theorems are discussed along with applications to physics, especially electrodynamics."


I first encountered differential forms in the classic GRAVITATION by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler but I later found that electrical engineers I knew considered it to be a fancy theoretician's formalism impractical for everyday use.Yet, differential forms have become more and more popular it seems and some of the more modern introductory texts on vector analysis have a chapter on differential forms.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Link to work cited in previous post is now fixed.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top