What is the acceleration due to gravity on the distant planet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsit
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration due to gravity on a distant planet using a hanging ball and a wire. An astronaut measures the time for a wave pulse to travel the wire and initially calculates gravity as 624 m/s², which is incorrect. After guidance, the astronaut recalculates using the correct formulas, arriving at a value of approximately 1.19 m/s² for gravity on the distant planet. The importance of retaining precision in calculations is emphasized to avoid discrepancies in results. The final calculation confirms that gravity on the distant planet is significantly lower than Earth's 9.8 m/s².
Physicsit
Can anyone verify my results below

To measure the acceleration due to gravity on a distant planet, an astronaut hangs a 0.085-kg ball from the end of a wire. The wire has a length of 1.5 m and a linear density of 3.1 ´ 10-4 kg/m. Us-ing electronic equipment, the astronaut measures the time for a transverse pulse to travel the length of the wire and obtains a value of 0.083 s. The mass of the wire is negligible compared to the mass of the ball. Recalling that the speed, v, of a small-amplitude wave on a string is given by
v=squareroot(F/(m/L))

mball= .085 kg
L= 1.5 m
m/L = 3.1 * 10^-4 kg/m (linear density)
t= 0.083 s
F=Tension=mg= (.085 kg)(9.8 m/s^2) F=.833 N

v=squareroot(.833(3.1*10-4) = 51.8 m/s

v= initial velocity + at

initial velocity=0

51.8 = 0 + a(.083)

51.8/.083 = a

acceleration= 624 m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.

In this situation, g is not 9.8 m/s^2.

9.8 m/s^2 is the acceleration due gravity near the surface of the earth. You are trying to find the equivalent quantity at the surface of that distant planet. The equation you are using, I would write as:

v = √(T/μ)

where v is the velocity of the wave, T is the tension in the wire, and μ is the mass per unit length of the wire. Note that T = mg in this situation is the weight of the ball only because the ball is suspended from, and therefore pulling down on, the wire. Since you are told that mass of the wire is negliglble, the weight of the ball is the only source of tension.

The weight of the ball THERE is mg. Therefore, g is the answer you are looking for. V, you are given (since you have been told the length of the wire and the amount of time it takes for the wave to traverse it).

Try again & see what you get.

PS: this equation:
v= initial velocity + at
has no applicability here at all. It applies to a moving object undergoing a constant rate of acceleration, such as an object in free fall, for example. (You understand that the ball is just hanging from the wire, not falling, don't you?)
 
Last edited:
Alright this should be it then

thank you for the guidance


does this look better


v=distance/time 18.07 m/s

18.07 m/s = ã(F/(m/L))

18.07= ã((m*g)/(m/L))

18.07 = ã((.083*g)/(3.1 * 10^-4))

((18.07^2)*(3.1 * 10^-4))/.083 = g

g =1.22 m/s^2
 
Close. I get 1.19 m/s2

The difference is that you used rounded intermediate results in your calculation.

If, instead, you rearrange the equations like this:
v = Δs/Δt
and
v = √(mg/μ)
Δs/Δt = √(mg/μ)
(Δs/Δt)2 = mg/μ
g = μ(Δs/Δt)2/m

Now enter the original amounts in your calculator:
g = 3.1x10-4(1.5/.083)2/.085
you'll get
g = 1.19...

It's better to hold off rounding until the end, or at least keep one or two extra decimal places in the intermediate results & then finish rounding at the end.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top