1-D Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Problem

AI Thread Summary
In a one-dimensional quantum mechanics scenario, the probability density for a particle in a box can be zero at certain points, known as nodes. This indicates that the particle cannot be found at those specific locations, but it does not mean the particle cannot pass through them. The particle's movement is not restricted by these nodes; rather, it can traverse these points despite the zero probability of being detected there. A helpful analogy is to visualize the particle as connected to a vibrating string, where it spends less time near the nodes despite having the ability to move through them. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the nature of quantum particles and their behavior in confined spaces.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



The probability density at certain points for a particle in a box is zero. Does this imply that the particle cannot move across these points? Explain. (I found a picture online http://www.everyscience.com/Chemistry/Physical/Quantum_Mechanics/.images/PBxWvfns1.gif).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



In a particle in a box, you can graph |ψ|2 is the probability of finding a particle at a certain point in space. If you graph the function, there are nodes where the function is equal to zero. I know that this implies that you will never find the particle at that specific location, and I also understand that the particle can still cross that node. I just cannot figure out a proper, physical way to explain this. I know that the answer is that these zero probability points do not imply that the particle cannot move across the points, but I am having trouble explaining why.

Any help would be great,
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it helps, imagine the particle as if connected to a vibrating string. It spends the shortest time in the vicinity of the point where its speed the highest is. The probability that you find the particle there is the lowest.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top