1D Quantum Well - I'm getting something very basic wrong

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of energy levels in a 1-D quantum well with a width of 5nm and a barrier height of 2eV. The participant initially struggles with the calculation, obtaining an incorrect value for n^2. Key advice emphasizes the importance of consistent unit usage, particularly in converting energy values and using the correct mass units. After correcting a mistake in the energy conversion, the participant successfully aligns their calculations with the expected result of approximately 134 energy levels. The conversation highlights the significance of unit consistency in quantum mechanics problems.
neural_jam
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Ok, so this example question is in my lecture notes:

Homework Statement



"For a 1-D quantum well, 5nm width, 2eV barrier height, calculate the number of energy levels in the well."

Homework Equations



So the equation given is a familiar one:

E_n=\frac{n^2 \pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2}

and he also said E_n=2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} J

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, in the lecture n^2 came out to be 134, but I keep getting ~1.9, so I'm using the wrong units somewhere or something, because otherwise it's a pretty simple 'plug and chug' exercise..!

also, I'm using
\hbar = 6.582 \times 10^{-16} eVs
m = 0.511MeV

Can anyone help? :-s

-Jam
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the units of mass are

[m] = eV/c^2

And therefore with the values that you are using it should be

E_n=\frac{n^2 \pi^2 \hbar^2 c^2}{2 m L^2}
 
Hi, thanks for the reply!

Unfortunately, if I put in the factor of c^2, then n^2 becomes ~2.13^{-17}, even further off the 134 that it should be :-(
 
Make sure that you use the same units for everything. That is if you use electron volts as you said in your first post then E = 2 eV. If you use Joules for E then you have to use Js for h, kg for m (without c^2 this time) and so on.
 
I get 133, which seems pretty close... it's probably just a silly math mistake. If you write out the details of your calculations (and please be consistent with the units ;-), someone can probably pinpoint where it went wrong.
 
Ah, thankyou! Yes, it was a silly mistake, I forgot to change E=2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} to E = 2, yes it works out fine now.

Thank you both, I have an exam tomorrow where this will likely be part of a question or two, so I'm very grateful for the help!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top