2^((-2)^x) =x how do you solve for x? without a calculator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hangainlover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculator
AI Thread Summary
The equation 2^((-2)^x) = x presents challenges in solving for x without a calculator, particularly due to the undefined nature of negative bases raised to irrational powers. Attempts to use derivatives lead to complications, including negative values within logarithmic functions. The discussion highlights that defining (-2)^x is crucial, as it is not defined for most irrational powers. While some transformations using logarithms are suggested, they ultimately do not yield a straightforward solution. The consensus is that solving this equation exactly in a finite number of steps is not feasible.
hangainlover
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I thouht about derivatives of both sides.
But it leaves me with a negative number inside ln...
I can't think of any way to solve it without a calculator
help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hangainlover said:
I thouht about derivatives of both sides.
But it leaves me with a negative number inside ln...
I can't think of any way to solve it without a calculator
help?
It can't be done exactly, in a finite number of steps. :smile:
 
hangainlover said:
I thouht about derivatives of both sides.
But it leaves me with a negative number inside ln...
I can't think of any way to solve it without a calculator
help?
The first thing you will have to do is define (-2)^x. A negative number to most irrational powers is not defined.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The first thing you will have to do is define (-2)^x. A negative number to most irrational powers is not defined.

In the complex range however they have a natural definition.
 
I don't think a calculator's going to help much either. My TI-89, with command "solve(2^((-2)^x,x)", returns "false". :)
 
2^((-2)^x)=x
log2((-2)^x)-log2(x)=0
log2(((-2)^x)/x)=0
((-2)^x)/x=1
x=(-2)^x
2^x=(-2)^x=x
I don't know how to proceed.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top