2.3 Exercises from the Feyman Lectures on Physics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around exercises from the Feynman Lectures on Physics, focusing on concepts of static equilibrium and the principle of virtual work. Participants explore the implications of forces acting on a body, particularly in different contexts such as outer space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of forces in static equilibrium, questioning the role of gravity and the implications of being in outer space. There are attempts to clarify the meaning of static equilibrium and the principle of virtual work, with some participants expressing confusion about notation and concepts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the principle of virtual work and its application to equilibrium, while others seek clarification on specific terms and concepts. There is a mix of understanding and confusion, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through definitions and mathematical expressions related to static equilibrium and virtual work, with some expressing uncertainty about specific notations and principles. There is an emphasis on understanding the conditions for equilibrium and the implications of forces acting on a body.

  • #31
Adesh said:
It seems that you have adjusted it’s height too!
I used \dots instead of typing period marks in -- oh, and, 'its', in the possessive sense, doesn't take the apostrophe -- that's for a contraction of 'it is'; not for a possession of something that belongs to something that we call 'it'.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
sysprog said:
I used \dots instead of typing period marks in -- oh, and, 'its', in the possessive sense, doesn't take the apostrophe -- that's for a contraction of 'it is'; not for a possession of something that belongs to something that we call 'it'.
Thank you for teaching me that. Something like that occurs in Shakespearen Sonnets too, “ ‘Tis “ , Shakespeare did it for his iambic feet (In my Opinion).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
  • #33
Assume that a rigid body consists of ##N## particles and i-th particle has a mss ##m_i## and a radius-vector ##\boldsymbol r_i##.
Principle of virtual work for equilibrium is written as follows $$\sum_{i=1}^N(\boldsymbol F_i,\delta\boldsymbol r_i)=0,\qquad (1)$$ here ##\delta \boldsymbol r_i## is a virtual displacement of the i-th particle.

Fix any point ##A## in the rigid body. Then $$\delta\boldsymbol r_i=\delta\boldsymbol r_A+\delta\boldsymbol\psi\times\boldsymbol\rho_i,\quad \boldsymbol\rho_i=\boldsymbol r_i-\boldsymbol r_A.\qquad (2)$$
Here ##\delta\boldsymbol\psi## is a virtual rotation of the rigid body (perhaps someone prefers another term).

Now plug formula (2) in (1). After some transformations we get:
$$(\boldsymbol F,\delta \boldsymbol r_A)+(\boldsymbol\tau_A,\delta\boldsymbol\psi)=0,$$
here ##\boldsymbol F=\sum_i\boldsymbol F_i## is the net force and ##\boldsymbol\tau_A=\sum_i\boldsymbol\rho_i\times \boldsymbol F_i## is the total torque about the point ##A##.

If ##\delta \boldsymbol r_A## and ##\delta\boldsymbol\psi##
are independent then we obtain the standard condition of equilibrium: ##\boldsymbol F=0,\quad \boldsymbol \tau_A=0##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny, Lnewqban and sysprog
  • #34
Adesh said:
Thank you for teaching me that. Something like that occurs in Shakespearen Sonnets too, “ ‘Tis “ , Shakespeare did it for his iambic feet (In my Opinion).
Using 'tis as an abbreviation for 'it is' is different from (incorrectly) using 'it's' for something possessed by an 'it'. Yes, a lot of of Shakespeare is written in iambic pentameter.
Mark Antony in Julius Caesar Act 3 Scene 2 said:
Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interrèd with their bones.
So let it be with Caesar. The noble Brutus
Hath told you Caesar was ambitious.
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Caesar answered it.
Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest—
For Brutus is an honorable man;
So are they all, all honorable men—
Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.
He was my friend, faithful and just to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adesh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
785
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
736