2.3 GPA good enough to get into an REU

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shinaolord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gpa Reu
AI Thread Summary
When considering applying for a Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program, the quality of your application is crucial. Strong letters of recommendation and relevant research experience are essential, especially if your academic performance is lacking, such as having a GPA around 2.3. Admissions evaluators will scrutinize your grades and letters closely. A poor academic record raises concerns about your preparedness for research, work ethic, and mastery of necessary material. If you have low grades across the board, it suggests you may struggle in a research setting. Even if you excel in major courses but fail general education classes, it can indicate a lack of commitment. Conversely, propping up a low GPA with easy courses may signal a focus on grades over genuine learning. It is advisable to improve your GPA and academic standing before applying for REUs to enhance your chances of acceptance.
Shinaolord
Messages
92
Reaction score
4
Is it good enough? Should I even bother applying? and I mean any REU, not just ones that are from high tier schools.
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll probably need some incredible letters of recommendation and/or research experience at your own school.
 
So there's no point in even trying ?
 
I'd never advise anyone to not try. What's the worst that can happen if you do?
 
Well if the probability is as small as you're implying then it's almost as if trying to find a needle in a haystack with a bunch of fake needles in there as well.
 
Do you think a high school principal's recommendation letter would be worth anything?
 
Just to clear up some confusion here. Are you currently enrolled in a university, or are you speaking of applying for an REU for the summer after high school?
 
University I just happen to have that as my best reference I know I need college ones but I'm sure that I wouldn't get the most spectacular recommendation letters.
 
If you sent a letter from high school, the conclusion will be (apparently correctly) that you couldn't get a good letter from college.

Why should an REU group take you, if you got poor grades and poor letters? I think that needs to be the focus of your application. (And just saying "but I am really really passionate" won't be enough)
 
  • #10
I would be very concerned. A 2.3 is a C average. It's not the number alone that's the problem, it's your work ethic and mastery of the relevant material.

To the person evaluating your application, there are three possibilities:

1.) You have straight C's in everything, including your major courses, which would make me concerned you wouldn't be prepared for the research and either unable to be productive, would require too much time to train, or wouldn't gain much from the experience.

2.) You've done very well in your major courses but failed general education courses. Well, that's good for understanding of the material, but what does it say about your work ethic if you've failed extremely easy courses like 100-level English and history? It will make them worry that you're lazy and consider certain tasks beneath you despite the expectation that you do them.

3.) You've flunked major courses but are propping up your GPA with easy courses. This will make it look like you're the sort of student who only cares about the grade, and by extension only cares about research experience for your resume, plus the other concerns about mastery of course content.

It's the first I'm most concerned about. Maybe you should spend a semester or two bringing that GPA up and passing some classes before you start looking for research.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
110
Back
Top