2 Cylinder elastic rotational collision

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a collision between two identical cylinders, one of which is sliding and the other stationary. The collision is elastic, and the post-collision angles of the cylinders are given as 45 and 30 degrees. The original poster expresses difficulty in visualizing the problem due to the lack of a sketch.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the collision and the angles involved, with some attempting to relate it to familiar scenarios like a pool ball collision. Questions arise regarding the definition of the angles and the role of friction in determining rotational energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the collision mechanics. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of conservation laws, but there is no consensus on the specifics of the angles or the implications of friction on rotational energy.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the friction between the surfaces, which is noted as a factor in determining rotational energy. The original poster has not yet attempted a solution.

redivider
Messages
8
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


[/B]
A cylinder with mass 3kg slides on ice with its base surface at 5m/s and collides with an identical but stationary cylinder. The collision is elastic. After the collision, the center-masses of the cylinders move at angles 45 and 30 degrees from the starting direction, What is the rotational energy of the first cylinder?

Ok so the problem I am having here is that I cannot picture the problem and that is why I am asking here as there is no sketch in the book. I do not understand how the angles are set up.

Homework Equations


[/B]
Is it any of these? :
http://i.imgur.com/mXYFaDV.png
I'm feeling pretty dumb, bear with me :frown:.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not yet attempted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
redivider said:
Is it any of these? :
Yes. One of those.

Now, two of them are impossible (think about which and why) so only one remains.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: redivider
Well the collision happens at an angle not head-on so I believe it is the 2. one, and the angle under which the first one hits the second one is, I believe (45+30)/2 and then I pretty much have the solution, just the "muscle exercise" remains.
 
redivider said:
What is the rotational energy
I see no suggestion that anything is rotating.
redivider said:
the angle under which the first one hits the second one
Not sure what you mean by that.
 
Imagine a pool ball getting hit, that's what I think this problem is similar to. The collision happens like so: http://i.imgur.com/htf6M8X.png

EDIT: I don't know how to explain it in english I guess, this is what I meant: https://vid.me/DVHd
 
Last edited:
redivider said:
Imagine a pool ball getting hit, that's what I think this problem is similar to. The collision happens like so: http://i.imgur.com/htf6M8X.png

EDIT: I don't know how to explain it in english I guess, this is what I meant: https://vid.me/DVHd
Sure, but
  • I do not know what you are defining as the "angle under which the first hits the second"
  • The acquisition of rotational energy depends on the friction of the surfaces, which is not specified.
 
haruspex said:
The acquisition of rotational energy depends on the friction of the surfaces, which is not specified.
Well, the angles are given so you can use conservation of momentum to find the velocities and conservation of energy and angular momentum to find the rotations. This is a question based on conserved quantities, not forces and torques.
 
Orodruin said:
Well, the angles are given so you can use conservation of momentum to find the velocities and conservation of energy and angular momentum to find the rotations. This is a question based on conserved quantities, not forces and torques.
Ok, I was forgetting that the definition of elastic collision means that not only is no energy lost to the elastic deformation of the materials, but none is lost to friction between contact surfaces either.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K