2-D kinematics/Forces (weight up an incline)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ubbaken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline
AI Thread Summary
A 123 kg chesterfield is pushed up a frictionless ramp inclined at 26.9° at a constant speed, requiring a horizontal force from the delivery person. The initial calculations incorrectly focused on the horizontal component of the weight, leading to confusion about the correct force needed. The correct approach involves analyzing forces parallel and perpendicular to the ramp's surface, resulting in a pushing force of 612 N. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct trigonometric relationships and understanding equilibrium in the context of forces. Ultimately, the resolution highlights the need for clarity in interpreting the problem and applying the right equations.
ubbaken
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The Question:
A 123 kg chesterfield is pushed up a frictionless ramp at a constant speed by a delivery person.
If the ramp is inclined at 26.9° to the horizontal, what horizontal force must the delivery person apply to the chesterfield?

http://capa.physics.mcmaster.ca/figures/hr/Graph05/hr-pic0563.png

The way I am thinking about the problem is that the answer should be the horizonal component of the F(g) (weight) of the chesterfield (C). Since balancing that force would produce a net force of 0 in the horizontal dimension.

Drawing it out, the y' of w is wcosθ and x' is wsinθ. So the horizonal component would be (wsinθ)cosθ. The number I get for that is 486.85N (using g=9.81). This is apparently incorrect.

So my question is: How am I supposed to think about this problem? What am I doing wrong? Also, the question seems a little ambiguous also, but how would any of you interpret it?

Thank you for your time and consideration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
To find the magnitude normal force use the following equation:
Fg = Fn cos0 (because the chesterfield is on a tilt)
Fn = Fg/cos0

Then I found the magnitude of the normal force in the X direction. That should be the force of the push.
 
Stop thinking in terms of x an y axes. Rotate you axes so that they are parallel and perpendicular to the surface. You now have to find the components of weight and the applied force that are "parallel" and "perpendicular."

Note: the normal force will balance all components perpendicular to the
surface. So all that is left are the components of applied force and weight parallel to surface.
 
Sorry, my x' was 'parallel' to the ramp and y' was perpendicular.

What I have are:
F(normal)=wcosθ and

F(push)=wsinθ=(123kg)(9.81m/s/s)sin(26.9deg)=546N

But that is incorrect...
 
ubbaken said:
Sorry, my x' was 'parallel' to the ramp and y' was perpendicular.

What I have are:
F(normal)=wcosθ and

F(push)=wsinθ=(123kg)(9.81m/s/s)sin(26.9deg)=546N

But that is incorrect...

Constant velocity implies equilibrium. So, the sum of the three forces, the normal force N (reaction from the ground to the chair), the weight of the chair W and the pushing force F, has to vanish, i.e. \vec{N}+\vec{W}+\vec{F}=\vec{0}. So, what applies to vectors, applies to their components, too. Place a coordinate system and off you go.
 
ubbaken said:
F(push)=wsin?=(123kg)(9.81m/s/s)sin(26.9deg)=546N
Since the pushing force is not paralle to the surface, then only the parallel componant of the push will be 546 N. What is the full magnitude of the push if this is one of the componants?
 
Chi Meson said:
Since the pushing force is not paralle to the surface, then only the parallel componant of the push will be 546 N. What is the full magnitude of the push if this is one of the componants?

That was my first post, I believe.
 
ubbaken said:
That was my first post, I believe.
If 545.9 N is a componant of hte pushing force, then the pushing force itself must be a larger magnitude. Go back and examine what you did with the cos theta.

The answer is 612 N
 
ah yes, I see now.

I was making some incorrect equalities with my angles.

Thank you for your help.
 
Back
Top