2 dimensional harmonic oscillator.find the energy eigenvalues?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the energy eigenvalues for a two-dimensional harmonic oscillator with a potential of (1/2)mω²(x² + 4y²). Participants suggest using separation of variables to solve the Schrödinger equation but express difficulty in proceeding. A solution approach involves breaking down the wave function into X(x) and Y(y) components, leading to two separate equations for each dimension. There is a recommendation to first understand the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, as mastering that concept will facilitate solving the two-dimensional case. Resources are shared to aid in understanding the one-dimensional oscillator, which is deemed essential for tackling the problem effectively.
humanist rho
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Potential of a simple harmonic oscillator is\frac{1}{2}m\omega<br /> ^{2}(x^{2}+4y^{2}).Find the energy eigenvalues?



Homework Equations



Seperation of variables,i think. But i got stuck in the midway.

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{-\hslash ^{2}}{2m}\left( \frac{\partial ^{2}\psi }{\partial x^{2}}+%<br /> \frac{\partial ^{2}\psi }{\partial y^{2}}\right) +\frac{1}{2}m\omega<br /> ^{2}(x^{2}+2y^{2})\psi =E\psi

\psi (x,y)=X(x)Y(y)

\frac{\partial ^{2}X}{\partial x^{2}}-\frac{m^{2}}{\hslash ^{2}}\omega<br /> ^{2}x^{2}X+\frac{2m}{\hslash ^{2}}E_{1}X=0

\frac{\partial ^{2}Y}{\partial x^{2}}-\frac{2m^{2}}{\hslash ^{2}}\omega<br /> ^{2}y^{2}Y+\frac{2m}{\hslash ^{2}}E_{2}Y=0

need a hint about how to proceed.
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to do the one dimensional harmonic oscillator?
 
genericusrnme said:
Do you know how to do the one dimensional harmonic oscillator?

Actually no.I was absent in the class,failed to understand it and later found abstract operator form more comfortable.

But i'll try
Thanks for the hint. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top