2-node Frame FEM element thermal formulation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the thermal formulation for a 2-node frame element in 3D space, specifically addressing the stiffness matrix and the incorporation of thermal loading. The user seeks confirmation on the correct formulation of the thermal coefficients matrix, which includes additional coefficients contributing to the right-hand side of the equation KxU=F. It is noted that a uniform temperature rise does not induce bending, and a thermal gradient is necessary for such effects in frame elements. The correct load vector for thermal expansion is derived, emphasizing the need to apply axial loads to counteract the expansion caused by temperature changes. The importance of subtracting thermal strains before calculating element stresses is also highlighted.
Ronankeating
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
\inthi all,

I need just little bit of confirmation about what I'm doing.

Normally I know how the stiffness matrix is composed for 2 node frame element in 3D space. which creates 12x12 matrix for that element, if there is also thermal loading on frame element additional coefficients(Q12x1 matrix) will contribute to the RHS of KxU=F equation.

Q=TRANSPOSE(\begin{bmatrix}Px1&0&0&0&-My1&Mz1&-Px2&0&0&0&My2&-Mz2\end{bmatrix})
where
Px = E*A*\alpha*ΔT
My = \int \alpha*E*ΔT*z*dA
Mz = \int \alpha*E*ΔT*y*dA

Is this the correct formulation of 3D frame elements thermal coefficients matrix?

Frame stiffness matrix works flawlessly, but if I introduce the Q on the right side of linear equations I always get the wrong solutions. The process itself is so simple but couldn't spot what I'm doing wrong.

Your help will be appreciated,

Regards,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A uniform temperature rise in a beam element will not create any bending. To bend the beam you would need a thermal gradient from one side to the other. That is sometimes included in thermal loading of plate elements, with heat flowing through the thickness of the plate, but it doesn't sound very relevant for a building frame element.

The "simple" way to derive the loads is consider what happens to an element without any external loads or restraints. It will expand by an amount ##\alpha L \Delta T## where ##L## is the length of the element. To force it back to its original length, you need to apply axial loads ##F## and ##-F## at the two ends, where ##F = K \alpha L \Delta T##.

The axial stiffness ##K = EA/L##, so ##F = EA \alpha \Delta T##.

The load vector, in the element coordinate system, is
##Q = \begin{bmatrix} F & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -F & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}##.
(Warning, Q might be minus the above, but that's easy enough to check with a test problem.)

Remember you also need to subtract the thermal strains before you calculate the element stresses!
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top