Hi again Joqe:
Roughly speeking, first order degenerate perturbation theory diagonalizes
your Hamiltonian. The eigenfunctions are your correction to the wave
function and the eigenvalues to the energy. In this case you may use it,
because you have two different states with the same energy. Particle
1 on [tex]n_{1}=1[/tex] and spin "up" and particle 2 on [tex]n_{2}=1[/tex] and
spin "down". There are different states but with the same energy. But, if you
see, you doesn't have the problem, because you interaction is diagonal.
I think that you doesn't have any problem to calculate:
[tex]<\Psi_{12}|A\delta(x_{2}-x_{1})|\Psi_{12}>[/tex]
for your energy shift
Now, we still have the wave function problem. How we found it?
If there are Fermions (half-integer spin) you know that the total wave function
have to be Anti-symetric. But, this gave us two system configuration.
[tex]\Psi_{n_{1},n_{2}}^{AS}(x_{1},x_{2}) = \Phi^{AS}(x_{1},x_{2})\chi^{S}(S_{1},S_{2})[/tex]
or
[tex]\Psi_{n_{1},n_{2}}^{AS}(x_{1},x_{2}) = \Phi^{S}(x_{1},x_{2})\chi^{AS}(S_{1},S_{2})[/tex]
Where [tex]\chi^{AS}[/tex] is the triplet state for the two 1/2 spin particles
and [tex]\chi^{S}[/tex] is the singlet state. And:
[tex]\Phi^{AS}\equiv\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_{n_{1}}(x_{1})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{2}) - \psi_{n_{1}}(x_{2})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{1}))[/tex]
[tex]\Phi^{S}\equiv\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\psi_{n_{1}}(x_{1})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{2}) + \psi_{n_{1}}(x_{2})\psi_{n_{2}}(x_{1}))[/tex]
Are the spatial part of your total wave function
The interaction potential [tex]A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1})[/tex] doesn't depends of the
spin part of the wave function. When you calculate:
[tex]<\Psi^{AS/S}|A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1})|\Psi^{AS/S}> = <\psi^{AS/S}|A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1})|\psi^{AS/S}><\chi^{AS/S}(S_{1},S_{2})|\chi^{AS/S}(S_{1},S_{2})> = <\psi^{AS/S}|A\delta(x_{2} - x_{1})|\psi^{AS/S}>[/tex]
Because the spin parts are orthogonal.
Note what happens when [tex]n_{1}=n_{2}=1[/tex] you only have [tex]\Phi^{S}[/tex]
because the anti-symmetrical part annihilates. Then:
[tex]\Phi^{S}(x_{1},x_{2})=\frac{2}{L}Sin(\frac{\pi x_{1}}{L})Sin(\frac{\pi x_{2}}{L})[/tex]
Sorry about my english, I'm still learning.
Cordially
Cristóbal.