Quick question on iodination of acetone.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex48674
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acetone
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the iodination of acetone, focusing on the significantly lower concentration of iodine (I2) compared to acetone and HCl in a kinetics lab experiment. The reaction is identified as second order, with first order dependence on acetone and H+, and zero order with respect to I2, meaning iodine's concentration does not affect the reaction rate. The low concentration of iodine is likely due to economic considerations and safety concerns, as iodine is toxic. Monitoring the reaction involves observing the loss of yellow color from iodine, and higher concentrations could complicate the results due to non-linearity. Overall, maintaining a low concentration of iodine helps achieve more accurate and manageable reaction measurements.
Alex48674
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
In class today we did a lab with acetone (4M), iodine (.0050M), and HCl (1.0M). The lab was one kinetics and on determining the rate constant, rates, and orders. Which I've done fine, but I'm stuck on this question: Why is the concentration of I2 so much less then the other reactants?

Any help would be appreciated, and it's due tomorow =]

Btw

Rate=2.1 (Ms)^(-1) x 10^(-5) x (Acet) x (H+)

Second order reaction.

First order with respect to Acet and H+, zero order with respect to I2

Just to prove I've done the work =]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the rate of reaction is already slow because of the acetone and H+ reacting. if you use low concentrations of them, the reaction would be even slower.

and since iodine is zero order, using a very low concentration does not affect the rate. probably you have been given low concentration because of economic reasons or maybe to reduce health hazards when pipetting iodine, because it is toxic.
 
Ahhh thanks, that makes sense.
 
You followed the rate of reaction by monitoring the loss of yellow (iodine) color in solution. Concentrated solutions of iodine would not likely give you linearity with respect to concentration (Beer's law).
 
i guess this makes more sense!
 
Iodine is the main determinant in the reaction. So, the reaction will continue until it's gone. Therefore, increasing the concentration of Iodine would cause the reaction to go on much longer and usually a reaction that only takes a few minutes gives you much easier and more accurate numbers to deal with.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top