Missing solutions to exercises in Shankar's book?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikepinkerton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Exercises
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the discrepancies between the claims made in the prelude of Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" and the actual availability of solutions to exercises within the text. The author states that answers are provided for each exercise, but readers find that many exercises lack solutions, with only a few being solved at the end of the book. This has led to confusion about whether there is a terminology issue or if the preface reflects an oversight. Some participants suggest that a solutions guide might exist, while others note that professors often assign these problems, indicating their value in academic settings. The conversation highlights the challenges of self-studying quantum mechanics using this book, as readers seek clarity on the availability of solutions to verify their understanding of the material.
mikepinkerton
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just checked out the 1980 version of Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" from the library and started reading it after reading many rave reviews on Amazon.

In the prelude, on page xviii, he says "The answer to each exercise is given either with the exercise or at the end of the book." This could not be further from the truth. Most exercises have no solution, and the number of exercises solved at the end can be counted on all your fingers and maybe a few toes.

What am I missing? He clearly states the solutions are provided.

Now, before this degrades into a thread on whether or not I should be using answers, please don't. I know there are opinions on both sides. I just want to know what I'm clearly missing from the author's words. Sometimes I may want to use the solutions, that's my choice, and the author feels it important enough to provide them that he claims they are present.

Thanks
-Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A few other posts mention a solutions guide. Is that what I should be on the lookout for, or...?

-Mike
 
Is it a terminology issue? Are there "exercises" within the chapters that provide examples of how to apply the chapter content that are distinct from "problems" or "questions" given at the end of chapters? Or, it might be a sentence carried over from an earlier edition...instructors using the text may have provided feedback that they didn't want all the answers available so they could assign some problems as homework, so maybe they removed solutions and left them just for "selected" examples?
 
I don't think it's a terminology or an edition issue. The exercises are inline, there aren't any at the end of chapters or sections. I'm looking at the first edition (1980). I'm not sure if the 2nd edition is any better, but given that there have been thousands of views of another thread looking for solutions, I'd doubt it.

-Mike
 
I only have the second edition handy, but it reprints the preface to the first edition, where he says only that answers for "most" of the exercises are provided. It does say in the prelude that the answer to "each" is provided, so I don't think it's a terminology thing, but definitely a mistake - and even so, when there are answers, that's all there is; no solutions.

I've never seen a solutions guide for Shankar (then again, I'm not a teacher) but it seems a lot of professors like using Shankar problems. If you need a solution, sometimes just a google search for the key words in the problem will deliver one.
 
I am trying to teach myself QM using Shankar's book. Unfortunately, not all of the the exercises have solutions (even though the introduction seems to say that solutions are in the text). If anyone knows where to find solutions it would be much appreciated. It is a bit difficult knowing if you actually understand something without a check.

Thanks.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top