2d Coulomb and Biot-Savart laws

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the 2D Coulomb and Biot-Savart laws using Maxwell's equations. The derivation of Coulomb's law is confirmed to be correct, with a minor correction to the expression for the electric field, which should be Er = lambda/(2*eps0*pi*r). The potential in 2D is clarified to be V = -lambda/(2*eps0)*ln(r), emphasizing its dependence solely on the distance from the charge. For the Biot-Savart law, the vector potential is expressed as A = (mu0/(4*pi))*int((J(r')/r')*ds'), incorporating the current density. The discussion concludes with encouragement for further study and clarification of the derivations.
Tsunami
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find some sort of simple derivation of these laws in 2d, using the integral expressions of the Maxwell equations.

For 2d Coulomb, I found this:

Imagine a rod of infinite length along the z-axis, carrying a charge q which is uniformly divided:

rho (the charge/volume) = lambda*dz*delta(x)*delta(y)

with dq= lambda*dz

So, using the electrical Gauss' law, Er being the value of E in radial direction:

eps0*Er*2*pi*r*dz = lambda*dz

Er= lambda/(eps0*2*pi*r)

Er =-dV/dr

=> V= -lambda/(2*eps0)*ln(r)

So, Coulomb's law would be, with pi(r´) being the electrical charge of the surface evaluated in point r´, en ds´ being the surface that is integrated:

V(r) = -lambda/(2*eps0)* int ( ln(r-r´) , ds´) ?

Does that make any sense? Or is this way off the mark?

And for the Biot-Savart law in the same manner, will the vector potential be something analogous to this thing?

Thank you,

W.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your derivation of Coulomb's law is correct. For the Biot-Savart law, the expression for the vector potential in two dimensions is: A(r) = (1/(4πε0)) * ∫ ( (r-r') x dl' ) / |r-r'|^3
 


Hello W,

Thank you for your question. It seems like you are on the right track with your derivation of the 2d Coulomb and Biot-Savart laws. However, there are some minor corrections and clarifications that I would like to make.

Firstly, your expression for the electric field (Er) in 2d Coulomb's law should be Er = lambda/(2*eps0*pi*r) instead of Er = lambda/(eps0*2*pi*r). This is because in 2d, the surface area of a circle is 2*pi*r instead of 4*pi*r^2 in 3d.

Secondly, the expression for the potential (V) in 2d Coulomb's law should be V = -lambda/(2*eps0)*ln(r) instead of V = -lambda/(2*eps0)*ln(r-r'). This is because in 2d, the electric potential is only dependent on the distance (r) from the charge, and not on the position (r') of the charge.

In terms of the Biot-Savart law, the vector potential (A) in 2d is given by A = (mu0/(4*pi))*int((J(r')/r')*ds') where J(r') is the current density, r' is the position vector of the current element, and ds' is the surface element integrated over. This is analogous to your expression for the potential in 2d Coulomb's law, but with the addition of the current density term.

I hope this helps clarify your derivation. Good luck with your studies!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top