2d Motion, calculating time when v=0 from position vector

AI Thread Summary
To determine when the particle is at rest, the velocity vector must be set to zero by solving for both its components. The velocity vector is derived from the position vector by taking its derivative, resulting in v = (6t^2 - 42t + 60)ihat + (3t^2 - 15)jhat. To find the time when the particle is instantaneously at rest, both the x-component (vx) and y-component (vy) of the velocity must equal zero simultaneously. This means solving the equations 6t^2 - 42t + 60 = 0 and 3t^2 - 15 = 0 separately, and then finding the common solutions. Understanding that both components must be zero at the same time is crucial for solving this problem effectively.
bearandmoose
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The position vector of a particle is given by r= ihat(2t^3-21t^2+60t+10) +jhat(3/2)(t^2-10t+9)
At what time, if any, is the velocity of the particle zero (ie what time is the particle instantaneously at rest)



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Finding the velocity vector is simple, just taking the derivative of position
However, when I set that to 0 I have the ihat and the jhat and I don't know how to combine them to solve for the time. Is this even the right step?

If I take
v= (6t^2-42t+60)ihat+(3t^2-15)jhat
and set that to 0
how do I account for the vx and vy when setting that to 0?
Do I set vx and vy to 0 separately?

I'm really confused.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order for v to be zero, both components must be zero. (at the same time, of course)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top