3 children and a balancing a seesaw

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Children Seesaw
AI Thread Summary
To balance the seesaw with Boy A (50 kg) and Boy B (35 kg) on either end, Girl C (25 kg) needs to position herself appropriately. The initial calculations incorrectly included gravitational force and misidentified the masses. The correct approach involves placing the 35 kg and 25 kg children on the same side to counterbalance the 50 kg child. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the problem's diagram and verifying calculations. Proper setup and understanding of the seesaw mechanics are crucial for finding the correct position for balance.
Bones
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three children are trying to balance on a seesaw, which includes a fulcrum rock acting as a pivot at the center (x = 0), and a very light board 5.2 m long (see figure). Two playmates are already on either end. Boy A has a mass of 50 kg, and boy B a mass of 35 kg. Where should girl C, whose mass is 25 kg, place herself so as to balance the seesaw?

http://www.webassign.net/gianpse4/12-57.gif

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(45kg)(9.8m/s^2)(-2.6m)-(35kg)(9.8m/s^2)(2.6m)+(25kg)(9.8m/s^2)(x)
-1146.6N*m-891.8N*m+245N(x)
-2038.4N*m=-245N(x)
x=8.32m which is clearly not correct...please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bones said:

Homework Statement



Three children are trying to balance on a seesaw, which includes a fulcrum rock acting as a pivot at the center (x = 0), and a very light board 5.2 m long (see figure). Two playmates are already on either end. Boy A has a mass of 50 kg, and boy B a mass of 35 kg. Where should girl C, whose mass is 25 kg, place herself so as to balance the seesaw?

http://www.webassign.net/gianpse4/12-57.gif

(45kg)(9.8m/s^2)(-2.6m)-(35kg)(9.8m/s^2)(2.6m)+(25kg)(9.8m/s^2)(x)
-1146.6N*m-891.8N*m+245N(x)
-2038.4N*m=-245N(x)
x=8.32m which is clearly not correct...please help!

First of all skip putting the value of g. It cancels out.

Second of all put in the correct masses. 50 and 35.

Finally put the 35kg and 25 kg kids on the same sides and equal to the side with the 50 kg kid.
 
Thanks, that helped a lot. I didn't realize the picture did not match up with the problem. No wonder I was not getting the correct numbers.
 
Measure twice and then cut once.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top