MHB 311.1.5.19 parametric equation of the line through a parallel to b.

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the parametric equation of a line through point a, which is given as a vector, and parallel to vector b. The parametric equation is expressed as x = a + tb, where a = [-2, 0] and b = [-5, 3]. The calculations confirm that when t = 0, the equation yields point a, and when t = 1, it results in the point (-7, 3), verifying the direction of the line. The vector from point a to the new point also matches vector b, confirming the parallelism. This demonstrates a successful application of parametric equations in vector form.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{311.1.5.19}$
find the parametric equation of the line through a parallel to b.
$a=\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-2\\0
\end{array}\right],
\, b=\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-5\\3
\end{array}\right]$

ok I know this like a line from 0,0 to -5,3 and $m=dfrac{-5}{3}$
so we could get line eq with point slope formula

but this is be done by parametric eq

this was book section I tried to follow..

anyway...

$x=a+tb=
\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-2\\0
\end{array}\right]+t
\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-5\\3
\end{array}\right]$

maybe:cool:

Screenshot 2021-01-10 at 12.18.07 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Didn't you check this yourself?

When t= 0, [math]\begin{bmatrix}-2 \\0 \end{bmatrix}+ 0\begin{bmatrix}-5 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}-2 \\0 \end{bmatrix}[/math] so it goes through the right point, a= (-2, 0).

When t= 1, [math]\begin{bmatrix}-2 \\0 \end{bmatrix}+ 1\begin{bmatrix}-5 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}-7 \\3 \end{bmatrix}[/math] so it also goes through (-7, 3).

And the vector from (-2, 0) to (-7, 3) is [math]\begin{bmatrix}-7- (-2) \\ 3- 0\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}-5 \\ 3 \end{bmatrix}[/math] as desired.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K