MHB 311.1.5.19 parametric equation of the line through a parallel to b.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{311.1.5.19}$
find the parametric equation of the line through a parallel to b.
$a=\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-2\\0
\end{array}\right],
\, b=\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-5\\3
\end{array}\right]$

ok I know this like a line from 0,0 to -5,3 and $m=dfrac{-5}{3}$
so we could get line eq with point slope formula

but this is be done by parametric eq

this was book section I tried to follow..

anyway...

$x=a+tb=
\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-2\\0
\end{array}\right]+t
\left[\begin{array}{rr}
-5\\3
\end{array}\right]$

maybe:cool:

Screenshot 2021-01-10 at 12.18.07 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Didn't you check this yourself?

When t= 0, [math]\begin{bmatrix}-2 \\0 \end{bmatrix}+ 0\begin{bmatrix}-5 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}-2 \\0 \end{bmatrix}[/math] so it goes through the right point, a= (-2, 0).

When t= 1, [math]\begin{bmatrix}-2 \\0 \end{bmatrix}+ 1\begin{bmatrix}-5 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}-7 \\3 \end{bmatrix}[/math] so it also goes through (-7, 3).

And the vector from (-2, 0) to (-7, 3) is [math]\begin{bmatrix}-7- (-2) \\ 3- 0\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}-5 \\ 3 \end{bmatrix}[/math] as desired.
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
966
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top