Can Blood Balls Cool Faster in Vacuum or Air?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the cooling rates of a hypothetical blood ball in both vacuum and air, estimating the time required to cool from 310 K to 285 K. It calculates initial heat loss using empirical measurements, indicating that conductive effects are significantly higher than radiative effects. The total heat released from the blood is substantial, leading to an estimated cooling timescale of approximately 338 days in air, assuming consistent conditions. The conversation also touches on the need for a computational model to simulate these cooling dynamics accurately. The context of using human blood raises playful speculation about vampire themes, particularly with Halloween approaching.
nehorlavazapal
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

If we took the blood of all people here on Earth and made a ball of it (r=200, T = 310 K) how long would it take for it to cool down to ~ 285 K in vacuum (absent of sunglight)? How long would it take to cool down in air, with reasonable conduction speeds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
empirical measurements can be used to approximate this to something like 10 W/m^2*K in air, where the K comes from the temperature difference between the ball and the air.

So for example your initial heat loss would be (4/3)*pi*200^2*10*(310 - 285), surface area times 10 times temperature difference. As the body cools this heat loss will drop as the surface temperature (310) will not be a constant, so you're solving a differential equation here.

Conductive effects are usually a lot higher, radiation will be a lot lower.

The link between heat flux and time to steady-state temperature is entirely governed by the heat capacity of the object.
 
The total heat released will be 4180 J per kg × 25 × 35 billion = 3,65 × 10^15 J.

Wow, that's a lot of heat stored in human blood! S = 502 000 m^2. So in total each m^2 would need to radiate/conduct 7,2×10^9 J. That's a lot. Can somebody offer a model in some kind of computer program? This is basic stuff, so many programs should do the trick!
 
Using your values, the initial energy loss is 10W/(m^2*K) * 25K * 500 000m^2 = 125MW.
Assuming the interior conducts much better than the air/bubble surface, this gives a timescale of 7.2GJ/(125MW) = 338 days.

Assuming the air around the ball won't heat too much, this leads to an exponential decay of the temperature with a timescale of roughly one year.
WolframAlpha Plot (x in days, y in K)

Why human blood?
 
Must be a vampire or represent vampire related interests. After all, it's only a fortnight to Halloween!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top