4D angular coordinate system and corresponding hypervolume element

areslagae
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a 4D angular coordinate system (radius and three angles) and its corresponding "hypervolume element".

2D: polar coordinates - dA = r dr dtheta
3D: spherical coordinates - dV = r^2 sin(phi) dphi dtheta dr
4D: ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
4-D spherical coordinates:

x1 = r sin(theta1) sin(theta2) cos(phi)
x2 = r sin(theta1) sin(theta2) sin(phi)
x3 = r sin(theta1) cos(theta2)
x4 = r cos(theta1)

from which you can compute the hypervolume element.
 
Thanks.

Is "4-D spherical coordinates" established terminology?
Is this the "standard" transformation? I guess there are other ones?
 
areslagae said:
Thanks.

Is "4-D spherical coordinates" established terminology?
Is this the "standard" transformation? I guess there are other ones?

I just checked wikipedia. There, the generalization to arbitrary dimension is called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersphere#Hyperspherical_coordinates". They are the same that I gave you in the 4-D case except for the order of the coordinates.
I don't know what the standard term in the case n=4 is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top