4th Vertex in a 3D Parallelogram

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the fourth vertex of a 3D parallelogram given three vertices P, Q, and R. The coordinates of the vertices are provided, and the relationships between the vectors are defined.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations relating the vectors and share their attempts at solving for the fourth vertex S. There is uncertainty about the correctness of the method used and the interpretation of the sides of the parallelogram.

Discussion Status

Multiple participants have arrived at the same result for S, but there is ongoing questioning about the method and the definitions of the sides of the parallelogram. Some express confusion regarding the setup and whether the problem statement might contain an error.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential ambiguity in the problem statement regarding the sides of the parallelogram, which may affect the interpretation of the solution.

Temp0
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let P, Q, and R be the vertices of a parallelogram with adjacent sides PQ and PR. Find the other vector S.
P (2, 0 ,-1), Q (-2, 4, 1), R (3, -1, 0)


Homework Equations


PR = QS
PQ = RS


The Attempt at a Solution


I took the two equations and solved both of them, getting (-1, 3, 2) for S by making the coordinates of S into x, y, and z and solving the equations. However, my answer doesn't seem to be correct. Why am I wrong? Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Temp0! :smile:
Temp0 said:
Let P, Q, and R be the vertices of a parallelogram with adjacent sides PQ and PR. Find the other vector S.
P (2, 0 ,-1), Q (-2, 4, 1), R (3, -1, 0)

I took the two equations and solved both of them, getting (-1, 3, 2) for S

I don't understand your method, but your result seems correct. :confused:

(are you sure it isn't "with adjacent sides PQ and QR"?)
 
yeah... I get S = (-1,3,2) also.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Temp0! :smile:


I don't understand your method, but your result seems correct. :confused:

(are you sure it isn't "with adjacent sides PQ and QR"?)

Just checked, nope, PQ and PR... I think it might be a mistake in the book ;_;
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K