Civil Engineering - Help Understanding Level Surveying Misclosure Error

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding misclosure errors in level surveying within civil engineering. The user seeks clarification on the arithmetic checks for surveying data, specifically whether equal values on both sides of the equation indicate no mistakes. They also inquire if a result of zero implies no arithmetic or misclosure errors. Additionally, the user is confused about why discrepancies between initial and fly-back change point readings are not considered in the overall misclosure calculation. The thread highlights the complexities of ensuring accuracy in level surveys and the importance of understanding the implications of measurement differences.
tomtomtom1
Messages
160
Reaction score
8
Hello all

I am trying to understand the closing error of a Level Survey in civil engineering.

I have carried out a survey of a highway, I started the survey on a Temporary Bench Mark (TBM), I took several readings of point of interest and several change points. I ended the survey back onto the original TBM.

I have read that a simple calculation to check if an arithmetic mistake was made is to use the following equation:-

∑Back sight - ∑Foresight = Last Reduce Level – First Reduce Level

My first question is this:- am I correct in thinking that if the left hand side is equal to the right hand side then NO arithmetic mistake was made. If however one side was not equal to the other then an arithmetic mistake was made when reducing the levels.

My second question is this:- if after reducing the levels and applying the above formula the values for the left and right side was 0 then does this mean that there was no arithmetic error AND there is no misclosure error?

My final question is this:- in my survey the final reading was 150. After which I carried out a series of change points so that I could close back to my TBM. I chose to use the same change points to fly back to my TBM as I did when I began the survey, I did this so that I could compare my readings. But I have noticed that when I compare my change point reduce level values the values differ i.e.

Survey Station Initial RD Level Fly Back Reduce Level Diff
TBM 10000 9999 -1
40 (CP) 9100 9105 5
80 (CP) 9673 9678 5
120 (CP) 10019 10019 0

What I do not understand is if my misclosure is just -1 which is the difference from my start TBM reduce level and my end TBM reduce level then why do we not factor in the difference between the initial change point reduce levels and the fly back change point reduce levels??

Attached my survey data, can anyone help?

Thank you for all your help.
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
This sounds like a legitimate question from 2012, so I am bumping it.

Can anyone help?
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top