Gravitational Constant: Questions and Ideas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of an increased gravitational constant (G) on life on Earth and other celestial bodies. Participants speculate that animals might adapt by developing stronger muscles and larger organs, while humans could face more health issues like back problems. Additionally, changes in gravity could affect ocean wave heights and sports performance, such as cricket. The conversation emphasizes the vast and varied consequences of altering the gravitational constant on the universe. Overall, the topic raises intriguing questions about adaptation and physical laws in a hypothetical scenario of increased gravity.
Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
Hey, I have got some guestions, when I philosophized with me friends...

We have classic gravitational constant, say G... And now, constant is 2G, 5G or 100G... (increases).
Others constants and physics legislation is normal.

THEREAFTER...

How is live on Earth?
And other planets and universe object?

Have you got any idea?

Thanks and sorry for bad Englist.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If gravity increased I think many animals would slowly adapt by developing stronger leg muscles, and bigger hearts and lungs. Though we'd probably suffer more back problems, and do more damage whenever we tripped in the street.

Ocean waves might not be as high, and it would become rare to hit a 6 in cricket.
 
When G increases there'll be various innumberable changes made to the whole universe.:-p
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top