9.25 a centrifuge takes up only 0.127 m of bench space

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centrifuge Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the radius of a centrifuge that claims to occupy only 0.127 m of bench space while producing a radial acceleration of 4100 g at 6830 rev/min. The calculations reveal that the required radius is approximately 0.0785 m, leading to a diameter of about 0.157 m, which exceeds the claimed bench space. Thus, the advertisement's claim is proven false based on the derived calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radial acceleration and its formula
  • Knowledge of angular velocity conversion from rpm to rad/sec
  • Familiarity with basic physics principles related to centrifuges
  • Ability to manipulate and cancel units in equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the physics of centrifuges and their applications
  • Study angular velocity conversion techniques in detail
  • Explore the implications of radial acceleration in laboratory settings
  • Investigate the design specifications and limitations of laboratory centrifuges
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and laboratory sciences who are interested in understanding the mechanics of centrifuges and evaluating equipment claims.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textsf{An advertisement claims that a centrifuge takes up only $0.127 m$ of bench space}$
$\textsf{but can produce a radial acceleration of $4100 \, g$ at $6830 \, rev/min$}$

$\textsf{a. Calculate the requested radius of the centrifuge}$

OK the only thing I can guess here is $\frac{0.127}{2}$ as max
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\textsf{An advertisement claims that a centrifuge takes up only $0.127 m$ of bench space}$
$\textsf{but can produce a radial acceleration of $4100 \, g$ at $6830 \, rev/min$}$

$\textsf{a. Calculate the requested radius of the centrifuge}$

OK the only thing I can guess here is $\frac{0.127}{2}$ as max

$a_r = r\omega^2 \implies r = \dfrac{a_r}{\omega^2}$

you'll need to convert $\omega$ given in rpm to rad/sec
 
skeeter said:
$a_r = r\omega^2 \implies r = \dfrac{a_r}{\omega^2}$

you'll need to convert $\omega$ given in rpm to rad/sec

$r = \dfrac{a_r}{\omega^2}\\$
$\textit {how do you cancel the units? }\\$
\begin{align}
\displaystyle
\frac{0.127 \, m}{2} &\ge \dfrac{4100 \, g}{(6830\cdot 2\pi\cdot 60)^2 \, rad/s}\\
0.0635&\ge \frac{4100 \, g}{6.629849 \, rad/s}\\
0.0635&\ge 6.184
\end{align}not!
 
Last edited:
$\dfrac{6830 \, rev}{min} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi \,rad}{rev} \cdot \dfrac{1 \min}{60 \,sec} = \dfrac{683\pi}{3} \, \dfrac{rad}{sec}$

$r = \left(4100g \, m/sec^2\right) \left(\dfrac{3}{683\pi} \, \dfrac{sec}{rad} \right)^2 \approx 0.0785 \, m$

$d = 2r \approx 0.157 \, m > 0.127 \, m$

seems their "claim" is false ...
 


$\dfrac{6830 \, rev}{min} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi \,rad}{rev} \cdot \dfrac{1 \min}{60 \,sec} = \dfrac{683\pi}{3} \, \dfrac{rad}{sec}$

where do you get

$$\dfrac{683\pi}{3}$$
 
Last edited:
$\dfrac{6830}{1} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi}{1} \cdot \dfrac{1}{60} = \dfrac{6830 \cdot 2\pi}{60} = \dfrac{6830 \cdot \pi}{30} = \dfrac{683 \cdot \pi}{3}$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 111 ·
4
Replies
111
Views
25K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K