MHB 9.25 a centrifuge takes up only 0.127 m of bench space

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centrifuge Space
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\textsf{An advertisement claims that a centrifuge takes up only $0.127 m$ of bench space}$
$\textsf{but can produce a radial acceleration of $4100 \, g$ at $6830 \, rev/min$}$

$\textsf{a. Calculate the requested radius of the centrifuge}$

OK the only thing I can guess here is $\frac{0.127}{2}$ as max
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\textsf{An advertisement claims that a centrifuge takes up only $0.127 m$ of bench space}$
$\textsf{but can produce a radial acceleration of $4100 \, g$ at $6830 \, rev/min$}$

$\textsf{a. Calculate the requested radius of the centrifuge}$

OK the only thing I can guess here is $\frac{0.127}{2}$ as max

$a_r = r\omega^2 \implies r = \dfrac{a_r}{\omega^2}$

you'll need to convert $\omega$ given in rpm to rad/sec
 
skeeter said:
$a_r = r\omega^2 \implies r = \dfrac{a_r}{\omega^2}$

you'll need to convert $\omega$ given in rpm to rad/sec

$r = \dfrac{a_r}{\omega^2}\\$
$\textit {how do you cancel the units? }\\$
\begin{align}
\displaystyle
\frac{0.127 \, m}{2} &\ge \dfrac{4100 \, g}{(6830\cdot 2\pi\cdot 60)^2 \, rad/s}\\
0.0635&\ge \frac{4100 \, g}{6.629849 \, rad/s}\\
0.0635&\ge 6.184
\end{align}not!
 
Last edited:
$\dfrac{6830 \, rev}{min} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi \,rad}{rev} \cdot \dfrac{1 \min}{60 \,sec} = \dfrac{683\pi}{3} \, \dfrac{rad}{sec}$

$r = \left(4100g \, m/sec^2\right) \left(\dfrac{3}{683\pi} \, \dfrac{sec}{rad} \right)^2 \approx 0.0785 \, m$

$d = 2r \approx 0.157 \, m > 0.127 \, m$

seems their "claim" is false ...
 


$\dfrac{6830 \, rev}{min} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi \,rad}{rev} \cdot \dfrac{1 \min}{60 \,sec} = \dfrac{683\pi}{3} \, \dfrac{rad}{sec}$

where do you get

$$\dfrac{683\pi}{3}$$
 
Last edited:
$\dfrac{6830}{1} \cdot \dfrac{2\pi}{1} \cdot \dfrac{1}{60} = \dfrac{6830 \cdot 2\pi}{60} = \dfrac{6830 \cdot \pi}{30} = \dfrac{683 \cdot \pi}{3}$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top