A 59 kg pole vaulter falls from rest from a height of 4.7 m onto a

  • Thread starter Thread starter hailstorm17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Pole Rest
AI Thread Summary
A 59 kg pole vaulter falls from a height of 4.7 m and lands on a foam rubber pad, coming to rest in 0.34 seconds. The discussion focuses on calculating the athlete's velocity just before impact, which is determined to be -9.6 m/s, and the constant force exerted during the collision, calculated as 1666 N. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the physics concepts involved, such as momentum and acceleration, rather than just seeking answers. Questions arise about the fundamental principles of physics that govern the fall and the equations provided. Engaging with the problem is encouraged to facilitate learning.
hailstorm17
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
a 59 kg pole vaulter falls from rest from a height of 4.7 m onto a foam rubber pad. the pole vaulter comes to rest 0.34 seconds after landing on the pad. calculate the athlete's velocity just before reaching the pad. calculate the constant force exerted on the pole vaulter due to the collision. (the answers are: -9.6 m/s, 1666 N)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


you've got to post some form of attempt or at the very least a question..
we aren't going to just give you the answer, you won't learn anything from that

what about this problem do you not understand?
have you started to attempt to solve it, if so how far have you gotten?
 


i literally know nothing about physics. apparently I'm supposed to use the following:
delta p=Ft
mv=Ft
z=1/2at^2
 


hailstorm17 said:
i literally know nothing about physics. apparently I'm supposed to use the following:
delta p=Ft
mv=Ft
z=1/2at^2

That'll be a bit of bother then.. how come you are doing physics problems if you know nothing of physics?


Regarding the first part of the problem, do you know what it is that makes the pole vaulter fall to the ground? If so, do you know how to relate that to the equations you have?
Furthermore, do you understand what the equations you have mean?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top