A and B are twins,A notice B moving away from him with velocity v

  • Thread starter Thread starter IPhO' 2008
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
IPhO' 2008
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
A and B are twins,A notice B moving away from him with velocity v, so A notice that B is youngerv than him (time dilation) , In the same way, B notice that A is younger than him.
What happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Search this forum for "twin paradox." There have been many discussions of this. In fact, there's one going on right now, with the title "Need help understanding the twins."
 


IPhO' 2008 said:
A and B are twins,A notice B moving away from him with velocity v, so A notice that B is youngerv than him (time dilation) , In the same way, B notice that A is younger than him.
What happen?

Image 4.26 in section 4.15 (Reversal of Time dilation) explains this all:

http://physics-quest.org/Book_Chapter_Non_Simultaneity.pdf


Regards, Hans
 


IPhO' 2008 said:
A and B are twins,A notice B moving away from him with velocity v, so A notice that B is youngerv than him (time dilation) , In the same way, B notice that A is younger than him.
What happen?
Actually, in this case, nothing is happening! Both are completely correct. Each sees the other as being younger than himself. This only becomes a "paradox" when the two twins are back in the same "frame of reference" (i.e. at rest relative to one another) together again. And that requires acceleration of one of the twins.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top