A car on black ice is on a banked road

  • Thread starter Thread starter x86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Ice
AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a stationary car on black ice on a banked road, the discussion revolves around the forces causing acceleration. Participants debate whether the cause is gravity, the horizontal component of the normal force, or a combination of both. The consensus leans towards gravity as the primary force, given that the normal force acts orthogonally to the direction of acceleration. Some confusion arises regarding the roles of the normal force's components, but ultimately, gravity is favored as the correct answer. The discussion emphasizes the need to select a single force in a high school physics context, reinforcing gravity as the main contributor to acceleration.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


A stationary car on black ice (no friction) is on a banked road and begins to experience some acceleration. What force is causing the acceleration?

a) The horizontal component of the normal force
b) The vertical component of the normal force
c) Gravity

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


This confused me, because the answer is clearly gravity (gsinx) but the horizontal component of the normal force also does make sense.

So is the answer a or c? From my understanding the normal force is only a reaction force... but it does make sense; say the normal force is applied at some angle; then isn't it possible for its x or y components to cause acceleration?

I'm not sure which is correct for bank turns, because I've learned that the horizontal component is from gravity (gsinx) but some websites say its the normal force (Nsinx). What would be the force in this scenario?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In my view it's the resultant of all 3. Do you have to pick one?
If I had to pick one I'd say gravity, on the basis that the normal force is orthogonal to the direction of acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
haruspex said:
In my view it's the resultant of all 3. Do you have to pick one?
If I had to pick one I'd say gravity, on the basis that the normal force is orthogonal to the direction of acceleration.

Yes we have to pick one. It's a high school physics course so I guess gravity doing it would be enough
 
I would say gravity as well.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top