A cheerleader is practicing her baton twirling. The baton has two .6kg masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lo.Lee.Ta.
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A cheerleader is practicing baton twirling with a baton that has two 0.6 kg masses on a 70 cm rod, twirling at 1.6 revolutions per second. The angular velocity was calculated to be 10.05 rad/s after converting revolutions to radians. The total kinetic energy was computed using the formula KE(total) = 1/2(I)(ω^2) for both masses, resulting in a total of 7.58 Joules. There was some uncertainty about the calculation method and whether the angular velocity was applied correctly, but the final formula used for kinetic energy was confirmed to be accurate. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding rotational dynamics in calculating kinetic energy.
Lo.Lee.Ta.
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Hi, everyone! Thank you for using your time to try to help me! You are kind! :)

1. A cheerleader is practicing her baton twirling. The baton has two .6kg masses attached to opposite ends of a massless rod 70cm long. If the baton is twirled about a point 30cm from one end at 1.6 revolutions per second, what is the baton's kinetic energy?

2. KE(total) = KE(1) + KE(2)
v=ωr
# of revolutions = # of radians / 2pi
I for a baton with a massless rod in between: I = mr^2

3. Okay, so I don't know if I'm doing this right...

*Changing revolutions/s to radians/s to know what the angular velocity (ω) is:
1.6 revolutions/s x #rad/2pi = 10.05rad/s

So now we know the angular velocity (ω) = 10.05rad/s

*KE(total) = KE(1) + KE(2)
KE(total) = 1/2(I)(ω^2) + 1/2(I)(ω^2)
KE(total) = 1/2(.6)(.30^2)(10.05^2) + 1/2(.6)(.40^2)(10.05^2)
KE(total) = 7.58J

...I have no idea if that's right... I'm not sure if I use the same thing for the angular velocity... I think both .6kg masses move at the same speed... not sure though. :frown:

Thank you for helping me to figure this out! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lo.Lee.Ta. said:
KE(total) = 1/2(.6)(.30^2)(10.05^2) + 1/2(.6)(.40^2)(10.05^2)
looks right to me.
 
Oh, really? Yay! Thanks, Haruspex! :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top