A circle in a non-euclidean geometry

June_cosmo
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a universe described by the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric which describes an open, closed, or
at universe, depending on the value of k:
$$ds^2=a^2(t)[\frac{dr^2}{1-kr^2}+r^2(d\theta^2+sin^2\theta d\phi^2)]$$
This problem will involve only the geometry of space at some fixed time, so we can ignore thedependence of a on t, and think of it as a constant. Consider a circle described by the equations:
$$r=r_0$$
$$\theta=\pi/2$$
(a) Find the circumference S of this circle. (Hint:break the circle into infinitesimal segments of angular size dphi,
calculate the arc length of such a segment, and integrate.)
b) Find the radius Rc of this circle. Note that Rc is the length of a line which runs from the origin to the circle (r = r0), along a trajectory of theta=pi/2 and phi= const. Consider the case of open and closed universes separately, and take k= 1 or k=-1 as discussed in lecture. (Hint: Break the line into infinitesimal segments of coordinate length dr, calculate the length of such a segment, and integrate.)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to derive dphi from the first equation provide?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
June_cosmo said:
I don't know how to derive dphi from the first equation provide?
You don't need to derive it. You use it as your integration differential.

The length is
$$\int_C\sqrt{ds^2}$$
where ##C## is the circle around which you are integrating. Use the metric equation to convert the ##\sqrt{ds^2}## into a simple function of ##d\phi##. What happens to ##dr## and ##d\theta## given you've fixed ##r## and ##\theta##?
 
Oh I get it! so dr and dtheta would be 0. so that
$$ds^2=a^(t)*r^2sin^2\theta d\phi^2$$
$$ds=a*rd\phi$$, the circumstance would be 2*pi*r0a.
but I still don't quite get the second question. If we hold theta and phi constant this time, $$ds=a\sqrt{\frac{1}{1-kr^2}}dr$$,from where to where do we integrate?
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top