A compact car, mass of 725 kg, is moving at 100 km.hr.

  • Thread starter Thread starter kath102245
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Compact Mass
AI Thread Summary
The momentum of the compact car, with a mass of 725 kg moving at 100 km/hr, is calculated to be approximately 20,133.25 kg·m/s after converting the speed to 27.77 m/s. To find the velocity at which the larger car, weighing 2175 kg, has the same momentum, the equation 20,133.25 = 2175V is used, resulting in a velocity of about 9.256 m/s. This calculation aligns with the understanding that the larger car must travel at a lower speed to match the momentum of the smaller car due to its greater mass. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unit conversion and the relationship between mass, velocity, and momentum in physics.
kath102245
A compact car, mass of 725 kg, is moving at 100 km.hr. What is its momentum? At what velocity is the momentum of a larger car, mass 2175 kg, equal to that of the smaller car?


this is what i have so far:
p=725(100 km/hr)

but i don't kno how to change km/hr into m/sec. And i don't know how to do the second part of the question.

Please help!
Kat
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kath102245,

Try using a "conversion factor," like this one:

1 kilometer
--------------
1000 meters

Notice that the quantities on the top and bottom are equal lengths -- they're different units, of course, but they represent exactly the same length. When you have the same thing on the top and bottom of a fraction, that fraction is equal to one. Therefore, this fraction is just one. When you multiply something by one, you do not change it, of course, so you can use such a conversion factor anywhere that it is convenient.

Let's make use of two conversion factors:
Code:
 1 kilometer           1 hour
-------------  and  --------------
 1000 meters         3600 seconds

Now take your initial quantity (100 km/hr), and multiply it by these conversion factors as necessary to get the units you want. You want the result in meters per second. Start by attacking the "hours" with the second conversion factor, like this:
Code:
  100 kilometers        1 hour
 ---------------- * --------------
      1 hour         3600 seconds
Note that there's some cool stuff happening here: since "hours" is on the top and bottom, it cancels. You're left with just kilometers per second.

Now you can attack the "kilometers" the same way:
Code:
  100 kilometers        1 hour        1000 meters
 ---------------- * -------------- * -------------
      1 hour         3600 seconds     1 kilometer

Now the hours cancel, and so do the kilometers. You're left with meters on top, and seconds on bottom. To get the answer, just multiply the fractions:
Code:
     100 * 1 * 1000 meters     100,000 meters
  = ----------------------- = ---------------- = about 27.77 m/s
     1 * 3600 * 1 seconds      3,600 seconds

If you understand this, we'll go ahead and work on the next part of the problem.

- Warren
 
so then would the momentum be 20,133.25kgm/s? Then for the second part of the question...i'm thinking it would be something like this...

20133.25=2175V

20133.25/2175=V
V=9.256m/s

This doesn't seem right...
 
Originally posted by kath102245
so then would the momentum be 20,133.25kgm/s? Then for the second part of the question...i'm thinking it would be something like this...

20133.25=2175V

20133.25/2175=V
V=9.256m/s

This doesn't seem right...
Why doesn't that seem right? The small car is roughly three times less massive than the big one, and thus must have roughly three times the velocity to have the same momentum.

I believe your answer is correct!

- Warren
 
Thanks for your help Warren!
 
Warren gave you a conversion factor for the specific problem you were trying to calculate although if you find yourself in another situation like this one you have an easier way that applies to most Physics Equations (Note : this is mathematical but it does apply to physics.)

3a ^3 4
----- x -----
1 2ba

Expand the Exponents


3aaa 4
------ x -----
1 2ba


The "a" in the denomenator of the second fraction in the problem will cancel out one of the three "a's" in the numerator of the first fraction. Giving the Equation this apperance.


3aa 4
------ x -----
1 2b



Now you have eliminated 2 potential confusion areas. The Equation will turn out to equal.


3aa 4 12aa
------ x ----- = ------
1 2b 2b


You multiply the 2 top numbers and add the "a's" left, (variables hold the place of a number because everyone knows you cannot multiply a letter) coming out to 12aa. Then 1 being the identity element identifies the number being muultiplyed by it as itself, comin gout to 2b giving you the answer 12aa/2b. Now with physics if you are doing the simple equation F = m(a) you have mass = X kg and a = X m/s so you need to combine those 2 into one for the Force. The numbers are multiplyed so the units of measurment are as well. coming out like kg x m/s.

If Warrens didn't help here was a quick lesson a little rough around the edges but that good ok hopefully it helped with your homework and if not maybe the Math part will help for Algebra.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
874
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top