A couple of questions about Higgs Boson

davidoux2020
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have a couple of noob questions regarding the Higgs Boson (HB) and it's recent "discovery"


1. if the HB is so heavy (I understood it is heavier than a proton) and permeates the universe, why is it so difficult to detect it or produce it ?

2. Why do we have to collide protons in order to "produce" a HB ? I understood it was flowing throught the universe, not part of existing matter ... so how can it be uncovered by breaking apart existing matter ?


Many thanks for your help,

David
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if the HB is so heavy (I understood it is heavier than a proton) and permeates the universe, why is it so difficult to detect it or produce it ?
That's why. Because it's so heavy, it takes a high energy collision to produce it. It's difficult to detect because (a) it's very short-lived, and (b) the things it decays into can be easily produced in other ways, so seeing them is no guarantee they came from a Higgs.

I understood it was flowing throught the universe, not part of existing matter ... so how can it be uncovered by breaking apart existing matter ?
The Higgs field permeates the universe. The Higgs boson is an excitation of that field, which is what CERN thinks it's found. The Higgs field manifests its existence through the nonzero masses of the elementary particles, but the validation of the theory requires we must also produce the Higgs boson and measure its properties.
 
davidoux2020 said:
1. if the HB is so heavy (I understood it is heavier than a proton) and permeates the universe, why is it so difficult to detect it or produce it ?
I'd just like to add to the Bill_K's answer, that generally the heavier the particle is, the faster it decays. It's not strictly linear dependence and there are some exceptions when particle is heavy but decays slowly (neutron) or doesn't decay at all (proton) because they have nothing (or almost nothing) to decay into. But you expect that heavy particle will decay faster, unless you find some reason to the contrary.
 
If the Higgs field permeates all of space and gives mass to all particles...why doesn't it give mass to photons? What makes them 'immune' to the Higgs field?
 
It gives mass to all particles it couples to. If you work out the electroweak symmetry breaking mechanism, one particle has to stay massless, as one U(1) symmetry has to remain.
Gluons are massless, too, by the way.
 
Thanks for clearing that up ' its the field that fills space..' so many even quite scientific articles have said its the Higgs bosons that fill space, and that it creates an effect like moving through treacle etc - suely its only accelaration that is affected?
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top