A Dirac field can be written as two Weyl fields stacked on top of each other: [tex] \Psi= \left( \begin{array}{cc} \psi \\ \zeta^{\dagger} \end{array}\right) [/tex], where the particle field is [tex] \psi[/tex] and the antiparticle field is [tex]\zeta[/tex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So a term like [tex]P_L\Psi=.5(1-\gamma^5)\Psi=\left( \begin{array}{cc} \psi \\ 0 \end{array}\right) [/tex] should only involve the particle and not the antiparticle?

However, writing [tex]\Psi=\Sigma_s \int d^3p \mbox{ } [b_s(p)u_s(p)e^{ipx}+d_{s}^{\dagger}(p)v_s(p)e^{-ipx}] [/tex], some of the antiparticle gets involved when projecting it with [tex]P_L [/tex] since [tex]P_L v_s(p) [/tex] is not necessarily zero?

Is the interpretation that [tex] \psi [/tex] is a particle, and [tex] \zeta [/tex] is an antiparticle, wrong then?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Dirac field can be written as two Weyl fields

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Dirac field written | Date |
---|---|

A What does it mean for the Hamiltonian to not be bounded? | Nov 1, 2017 |

I Double sided arrow notation in Dirac Field Lagrangian | Oct 30, 2017 |

A The Lagrangian Density and Equations of Motion | Sep 28, 2017 |

A Quantized Dirac field calculations | Apr 13, 2017 |

Canonical momentum for Dirac adjoint field | Nov 24, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**